ReviewSeminars in immunology2013
Systems immunogenetics of vaccines.
Review in Seminars in immunology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technological breakthroughs and advancements in the application of mRNA vaccines: a comprehensive exploration and future prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Introduction of Vaccinomics to Develop Personalized Vaccines in Light of Changes in the Usage of Hantaan Virus Vaccine (Hantavax®) in Korea.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2019Article
- Propelling the Pediatric HIV Therapeutic Agenda With Science, Innovation, and Collaboration.Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999) · 2018Article
- A review of clinical models for the evaluation of human TB vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Review
- Early Transcriptome Signatures from Immunized Mouse Dendritic Cells Predict Late Vaccine-Induced T-Cell Responses.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Vaccinology in the era of high-throughput biology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Review
- Genetics and vaccines in the era of personalized medicine.Current genomics · 2015Article
- A systems biology approach to the effect of aging, immunosenescence and vaccine response.Current opinion in immunology · 2014Review
- Therapeutic Vaccine Strategies against Human Papillomavirus.Vaccines · 2014Review
- Reverse translation in tuberculosis: neutrophils provide clues for understanding development of active disease.Frontiers in immunology · 2014Review
- Systems-level analysis of innate immunity.Annual review of immunology · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Vaccines are the most cost effective public health measure for preventing viral infection and limiting epidemic spread within susceptible populations. However, the efficacy of current protective vaccines is highly variable, particularly in aging populations. In addition, there have been a number of challenges in the development of new vaccines due to a lack of detailed understanding of the immune correlates of protection. To identify the mechanisms underlying the variability of the immune response to vaccines, system-level tools need to be developed that will further our understanding of virus-host interactions and correlates of vaccine efficacy. This will provide critical information for rational vaccine design and allow the development of an analog to the "precision medicine" framework (already acknowledged as a powerful approach in medicine and therapeutics) to be applied to vaccinology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.