Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23886841›Full record

ArticleBone2014

A pre-clinical murine model of oral implant osseointegration.

S Mouraret, D J Hunter, C Bardet, J B Brunski, P Bouchard, J A Helms

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. A Model of Immediate Implant Placement to Evaluate Early Osseointegration in 129/Sv Diabetic Mice.The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

S MouraretDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, Rothschild Hospital, AP-HP, Paris 7 Denis, Diderot University, U.F.R. of Odontology, Paris, France.
D J Hunter
C Bardet
J B Brunski
P Bouchard
J A Helms
Stanford Medicine · USSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

Mechanobiology at Healing Bone-Implant InterfacesR01EB000504 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNSKI, JOHN BEYER, HELMS, JILL A · 2003 to 2011
$4.4M
Mechanobiology at Healing Bone-Implant InterfacesR01DE024000 · NIDCR · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNSKI, JOHN BEYER, HELMS, JILL A · 2014 to 2018
$3.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000504NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE024000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many of our assumptions concerning oral implant osseointegration are extrapolated from experimental models studying skeletal tissue repair in long bones. This disconnect between clinical practice and experimental research hampers our understanding of bone formation around oral implants and how this process can be improved. We postulated that oral implant osseointegration would be fundamentally equivalent to implant osseointegration elsewhere in the body. Mice underwent implant placement in the edentulous ridge anterior to the first molar and peri-implant tissues were evaluated at various timepoints after surgery. Our hypothesis was disproven; oral implant osseointegration is substantially different from osseointegration in long bones. For example, in the maxilla peri-implant pre-osteoblasts are derived from cranial neural crest whereas in the tibia peri-implant osteoblasts are derived from mesoderm. In the maxilla, new osteoid arises from periostea of the maxillary bone but in the tibia the new osteoid arises from the marrow space. Cellular and molecular analyses indicate that osteoblast activity and mineralization proceeds from the surfaces of the native bone and osteoclastic activity is responsible for extensive remodeling of the new peri-implant bone. In addition to histologic features of implant osseointegration, molecular and cellular assays conducted in a murine model provide new insights into the sequelae of implant placement and the process by which bone is generated around implants.

Indexed as

Dental ImplantsModels, AnimalOsseointegrationAnimalsBone RemodelingCell SurvivalHumansMaxillaMesodermMiceNeural CrestOsteocytesRadiographyTibiaWound HealingDental ImplantsDentalHistologyMaxillaMiceModelOral cavity

Identifiers

PMID23886841
PMCPMC4962868
OpenAlexW2135054836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.