Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23886070›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2013

Area-level socioeconomic characteristics and incidence of metabolic syndrome: a prospective cohort study.

Anh D Ngo, Catherine Paquet, Natasha J Howard, Neil T Coffee, Robert Adams, Anne Taylor, Mark Daniel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Socioeconomic Inequalities in Metabolic Syndrome by Age and Gender in a Spanish Working Population.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Geographic Clustering of Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Metropolitan Centres in France and Australia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anh D NgoSocial Epidemiology and Evaluation Research Group, Sansom Institute for Health Research, and School of Population Health, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, Australia. Anh.Ngo@unisa.edu.au.
Catherine Paquet
Natasha J Howard
Neil T Coffee
Robert Adams
Anne Taylor
Mark Daniel
University of South Australia · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe evidence linking socioeconomic environments and metabolic syndrome (MetS) has primarily been based on cross-sectional studies. This study prospectively examined the relationships between area-level socioeconomic position (SEP) and the incidence of MetS.

methodsA prospective cohort study design was employed involving 1,877 men and women aged 18+ living in metropolitan Adelaide, Australia, all free of MetS at baseline. Area-level SEP measures, derived from Census data, included proportion of residents completing a university education, and median household weekly income. MetS, defined according to International Diabetes Federation, was ascertained after an average of 3.6 years follow up. Associations between each area-level SEP measure and incident MetS were examined by Poisson regression Generalised Estimating Equations models. Interaction between area- and individual-level SEP variables was also tested.

resultsA total of 156 men (18.7%) and 153 women (13.1%) developed MetS. Each percentage increase in the proportion of residents with a university education corresponded to a 2% lower risk of developing MetS (age and sex-adjusted incidence risk ratio (RR)=0.98; 95% confidence interval (CI) =0.97-0.99). This association persisted after adjustment for individual-level income, education, and health behaviours. There was no significant association between area-level income and incident MetS overall. For the high income participants, however, a one standard deviation increase in median household weekly income was associated with a 29% higher risk of developing MetS (Adjusted RR=1.29; 95%CI=1.04-1.60).

conclusionsWhile area-level education was independently and inversely associated with the risk of developing MetS, the association between area-level income and the MetS incidence was modified by individual-level income.

Indexed as

Educational StatusIncomeSocial ClassAdultAgedAustraliaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMetabolic SyndromeMiddle AgedOdds RatioProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID23886070
PMCPMC3733986
OpenAlexW1970386815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.