Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23885839›Full record

ReviewLeukemia & lymphoma2014

Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly: do we know who should be treated and how?

Aziz Nazha, Farhad Ravandi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Leukemia & lymphoma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The NEDD8-activating enzyme inhibitor MLN4924 disrupts nucleotide metabolism and augments the efficacy of cytarabine.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Aziz NazhaDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center , Houston, TX , USA.
Farhad Ravandi

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the elderly is associated with several distinctive biological and clinical features compared to younger patients. Despite the advances in supportive care and the introduction of less intensive chemotherapy regimens, the overall outcome for this population remains poor. More importantly, the decision making process for choosing the appropriate treatment for individual patients, based on their comorbidities and the biological features of their disease, continues to be challenging for treating physicians. Currently, a significant number of elderly patients with AML do not receive treatment above and beyond supportive care; several studies have suggested that patients who receive any therapy have a better outcome than patients who receive palliation alone. Furthermore, the development of novel, targeted and less intensive therapies is providing new options suitable for older patients with multiple comorbidities and with high risk disease features. In this review, we highlight the challenges that face treating physicians when encountering elderly patients with AML and describe some of the potential strategies under development for treating older patients with AML and the available data from recent clinical trials.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsClinical Trials as TopicDecision MakingHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcutePrognosisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID23885839
PMCPMC4111566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.