Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23885291›Full record

ArticleJRSM short reports2013

Using mixed methods in health research.

Shema Tariq, Jenny Woodman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JRSM short reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05587517 (A Clinical Trial of Interventions to Support Family Surrogates of Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 182 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05587517 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Clinical Trial of Interventions to Support Family Surrogates of Critically Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2022 to 2027Enrolled172ConditionsGrief, Trauma, Psychotherapy, Critical CareArmsEMPOWER, Supportive Conversation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Patients' and GPs' views and expectations of home monitoring with a pulse oximeter: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a pilot randomised controlled trial.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2023
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Overview of the limb injury measurement battery for quality of life (LIMB-QOL).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Overview of Harvard's Inaugural Fukushima Field Trip Course.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2026
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shema TariqSchool of Health Sciences, City University London, EC1A 7QN, London, UK.
Jenny Woodman

Funding

Medical Research Council G0701648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mixed methods research is the use of quantitative and qualitative methods in a single study or series of studies. It is an emergent methodology which is increasingly used by health researchers, especially within health services research. There is a growing literature on the theory, design and critical appraisal of mixed methods research. However, there are few papers that summarize this methodological approach for health practitioners who wish to conduct or critically engage with mixed methods studies. The objective of this paper is to provide an accessible introduction to mixed methods for clinicians and researchers unfamiliar with this approach. We present a synthesis of key methodological literature on mixed methods research, with examples from our own work and that of others, to illustrate the practical applications of this approach within health research. We summarize definitions of mixed methods research, the value of this approach, key aspects of study design and analysis, and discuss the potential challenges of combining quantitative and qualitative methods and data. One of the key challenges within mixed methods research is the successful integration of quantitative and qualitative data during analysis and interpretation. However, the integration of different types of data can generate insights into a research question, resulting in enriched understanding of complex health research problems.

Identifiers

PMID23885291
PMCPMC3697857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.