ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2013
Endoscopy and polyps-diagnostic and therapeutic advances in management.
Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhanced adenoma detection with Endocuff Vision: a GRADE assessed systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of L-Menthol During Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Current Trends in the Biomarker's Discovery for the Treatment and Management of Colorectal Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Modeling age-specific incidence of colon cancer via niche competition.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Clinical characteristics of sentinel polyps and their correlation with proximal colon cancer: A retrospective observational study.World journal of clinical cases · 2019Article
- Giant tubular adenoma with malignancy clinical characteristics in a female teenager: Case report and a review of the literature.Medicine · 2016Review
- Diagnostic value of high-resolution micro-endoscopy for the classification of colon polyps.World journal of gastroenterology · 2016Article
- Management of Malignant Adenomas.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2015Review
- Use of blood-based biomarkers for early diagnosis and surveillance of colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2014Review
- Chemoprophylaxis of precancerous lesions in patients who are at a high risk of developing colorectal cancer (Review).Medicine internationalReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite multiple efforts aimed at early detection through screening, colon cancer remains the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States, with an estimated 51000 deaths during 2013 alone. The goal remains to identify and remove benign neoplastic polyps prior to becoming invasive cancers. Polypoid lesions of the colon vary widely from hyperplastic, hamartomatous and inflammatory to neoplastic adenomatous growths. Although these lesions are all benign, they are common, with up to one-quarter of patients over 60 years old will develop pre-malignant adenomatous polyps. Colonoscopy is the most effective screening tool to detect polyps and colon cancer, although several studies have demonstrated missed polyp rates from 6%-29%, largely due to variations in polyp size. This number can be as high as 40%, even with advanced (> 1 cm) adenomas. Other factors including sub-optimal bowel preparation, experience of the endoscopist, and patient anatomical variations all affect the detection rate. Additional challenges in decision-making exist when dealing with more advanced, and typically larger, polyps that have traditionally required formal resection. In this brief review, we will explore the recent advances in polyp detection and therapeutic options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.