The countermanding task revisited: mimicry of race models.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Efficacy of inhibitory control depends on procrastination and deceleration in saccade planning.Experimental brain research · 2020
   Article
2. The Stochastic Early Reaction, Inhibition, and late Action (SERIA) model for antisaccades.PLoS computational biology · 2017
   Article
3. Behavioural and computational varieties of response inhibition in eye movements.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
   Review
4. The modulatory role of second language proficiency on performance monitoring: evidence from a saccadic countermanding task in high and low proficient bilinguals.Frontiers in psychology · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The countermanding task revisited: fast stimulus detection is a key determinant of psychophysical performance.2013

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as