Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23884894›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2013

Triptan safety during pregnancy: a Norwegian population registry study.

Kateřina Nezvalová-Henriksen, Olav Spigset, Hedvig Nordeng

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Headache and pregnancy: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Managing Migraine During Pregnancy and Lactation.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.European journal of epidemiology · 2015
    Article
  15. Drug therapy in headache.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Generation R Study: Biobank update 2015.European journal of epidemiology · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kateřina Nezvalová-HenriksenDepartment of Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1065, Blindern, 0316, Oslo, Norway, katerina.nezvalova-henriksen@farmasi.uio.no.
Olav Spigset
Hedvig Nordeng
Norwegian Institute of Public Health · NOSt Olav's University Hospital · NOUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge on triptan safety during pregnancy remains limited to their class effect or studies on sumatriptan. Our aim was to evaluate the individual effect of four most frequently used triptans on several pregnancy outcomes. We used the Norwegian prescription database to access information on triptans redeemed by pregnant women living in Norway between 2004 and 2007. This database was linked to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway covering every institutional delivery in Norway and providing information on pregnancy, delivery, maternal and neonatal health. Estimates of associations with pregnancy outcomes were obtained by Generalised Estimation Equations analysis. Of the 181,125 women in our study, 1,465 (0.8%) redeemed triptans during pregnancy, and 1,095 (0.6%) redeemed triptans before pregnancy only (disease comparison group). The population comparison group comprised the remaining 178,565 women. Using this group as reference, we found no associations between triptan redemption during pregnancy and congenital malformations. Second trimester redemption was associated with postpartum haemorrhage (adjusted OR 1.57; 95% CI 1.19-2.07). The disease comparison group had an increased risk of major congenital malformations (adjusted OR 1.48; 95% CI 1.11-1.97), low birth weight (adjusted OR 1.39; 95% CI 1.08-1.81), and preterm birth (adjusted OR 1.30; 95% CI 1.06-1.60). The association of triptans with postpartum hemorrhage could be attributable to decreased platelet agreeability occurring in severe migraine. Likewise, the increased risk of major congenital malformations and other adverse pregnancy outcomes in the disease comparison group might be attributable to migraine severity.

Indexed as

Abnormalities, Drug-InducedAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornMiddle AgedMigraine DisordersNorwayPopulation SurveillancePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomePregnancy TrimestersTryptamines

Identifiers

PMID23884894
OpenAlexW2066492864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.