Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23884656›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2013

Rates and patterns of great ape retrotransposition.

Fereydoun Hormozdiari, Miriam K Konkel, Javier Prado-Martinez, Giorgia Chiatante, Irene Hernando Herraez, Jerilyn A Walker, Benjamin Nelson, Can Alkan, Peter H Sudmant, John Huddleston and 9 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Detection ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Fereydoun HormozdiariDepartment of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Miriam K Konkel
Javier Prado-Martinez
Giorgia Chiatante
Irene Hernando Herraez
Jerilyn A Walker
Benjamin Nelson
Can Alkan
Peter H Sudmant
John Huddleston
Claudia R Catacchio
Arthur Ko
Maika Malig
Carl Baker
Great Ape Genome Project
Tomas Marques-Bonet
Mario Ventura
Mark A Batzer
Evan E Eichler
University of Washington · USLouisiana State University · USUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITInstitut de Biologia Evolutiva · ESBilkent University · TRConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

Sequence and Assembly of Segmental DuplicationsR01HG002385 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Evan Eichler · 2001 to 2026
$13.3M
POPULATION GENETICS OF MOBILE ELEMENTSR01GM059290 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BATZER, MARK A, FESCHOTTE, CEDRIC · 1999 to 2018
$8.5M
European Research Council 260372Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNHGRI NIH HHS HG002385NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002385NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059290NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM59290
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyzed 83 fully sequenced great ape genomes for mobile element insertions, predicting a total of 49,452 fixed and polymorphic Alu and long interspersed element 1 (L1) insertions not present in the human reference assembly and assigning each retrotransposition event to a different time point during great ape evolution. We used these homoplasy-free markers to construct a mobile element insertions-based phylogeny of humans and great apes and demonstrate their differential power to discern ape subspecies and populations. Within this context, we find a good correlation between L1 diversity and single-nucleotide polymorphism heterozygosity (r(2) = 0.65) in contrast to Alu repeats, which show little correlation (r(2) = 0.07). We estimate that the "rate" of Alu retrotransposition has differed by a factor of 15-fold in these lineages. Humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos show the highest rates of Alu accumulation--the latter two since divergence 1.5 Mya. The L1 insertion rate, in contrast, has remained relatively constant, with rates differing by less than a factor of three. We conclude that Alu retrotransposition has been the most variable form of genetic variation during recent human-great ape evolution, with increases and decreases occurring over very short periods of evolutionary time.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationPhylogenyAlu ElementsAnimalsCluster AnalysisDNA PrimersGenomeGenomicsHominidaeHumansLikelihood FunctionsLong Interspersed Nucleotide ElementsPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisSpecies SpecificityDNA Primersgenetic diversitygenomicsretrotransposonstructural variation

Identifiers

PMID23884656
PMCPMC3746892
OpenAlexW2045006861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.