Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23884437›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2014

Disease-specific perception of fracture risk and incident fracture rates: GLOW cohort study.

C L Gregson, E M Dennison, J E Compston, S Adami, J D Adachi, F A Anderson, S Boonen, R Chapurlat, A Díez-Pérez, S L Greenspan and 14 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Incidence of fractures among patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Evaluation of a Multimodal, Direct-to-Patient Educational Intervention Targeting Barriers to Osteoporosis Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2018
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Clinical and demographic factors determining patient fracture risk decision point (FRDP): The improving risk communication in osteoporosis (RICO) project.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Osteoporosis in 2022: Care gaps to screening and personalised medicine.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

C L GregsonMRC Lifecourse Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK.
E M Dennison
J E Compston
S Adami
J D Adachi
F A Anderson
S Boonen
R Chapurlat
A Díez-Pérez
S L Greenspan
F H Hooven
A Z LaCroix
J W Nieves
J C Netelenbos
J Pfeilschifter
M Rossini
C Roux
K G Saag
S Silverman
E S Siris
N B Watts
A Wyman
C Cooper
GLOW Investigators
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USSouthampton General Hospital · GBUniversity of Verona · ITCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDélégation Paris 5 · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRAlfried Krupp Hospital · DEColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USHelen Hayes Hospital · USUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Medical Research Council MC_U147585819Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014Medical Research Council MC_UU_12011/1NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledAccurate patient risk perception of adverse health events promotes greater autonomy over, and motivation towards, health-related lifestyles.

introductionWe compared self-perceived fracture risk and 3-year incident fracture rates in postmenopausal women with a range of morbidities in the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).

methodsGLOW is an international cohort study involving 723 physician practices across ten countries (Europe, North America, Australasia); 60,393 women aged ≥55 years completed baseline questionnaires detailing medical history and self-perceived fracture risk. Annual follow-up determined self-reported incident fractures.

resultsIn total 2,945/43,832 (6.8%) sustained an incident fracture over 3 years. All morbidities were associated with increased fracture rates, particularly Parkinson's disease (hazard ratio [HR]; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.89; 2.78-5.44), multiple sclerosis (2.70; 1.90-3.83), cerebrovascular events (2.02; 1.67-2.46), and rheumatoid arthritis (2.15; 1.53-3.04) (all p < 0.001). Most individuals perceived their fracture risk as similar to (46%) or lower than (36%) women of the same age. While increased self-perceived fracture risk was strongly associated with incident fracture rates, only 29% experiencing a fracture perceived their risk as increased. Under-appreciation of fracture risk occurred for all morbidities, including neurological disease, where women with low self-perceived fracture risk had a fracture HR 2.39 (CI 1.74-3.29) compared with women without morbidities.

conclusionsPostmenopausal women with morbidities tend to under-appreciate their risk, including in the context of neurological diseases, where fracture rates were highest in this cohort. This has important implications for health education, particularly among women with Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, or cerebrovascular disease.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthSelf ConceptAgedAged, 80 and overChronic DiseaseCohort StudiesComorbidityFemaleHumansIncidenceKaplan-Meier EstimateLife StyleMiddle AgedNervous System DiseasesOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic Fractures

Identifiers

PMID23884437
PMCPMC3867337
OpenAlexW1977176593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.