Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23884402›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nutrition2013

Nutrition and neurodevelopment in children: focus on NUTRIMENTHE project.

Tania Anjos, Signe Altmäe, Pauline Emmett, Henning Tiemeier, Ricardo Closa-Monasterolo, Verónica Luque, Sheila Wiseman, Miguel Pérez-García, Eva Lattka, Hans Demmelmair and 11 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nutrition, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
17.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 135 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Tania AnjosDepartment of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Signe Altmäe
Pauline Emmett
Henning Tiemeier
Ricardo Closa-Monasterolo
Verónica Luque
Sheila Wiseman
Miguel Pérez-García
Eva Lattka
Hans Demmelmair
Bernadette Egan
Niels Straub
Hania Szajewska
Jayne Evans
Claire Horton
Tomas Paus
Elizabeth Isaacs
Jan Willem van Klinken
Berthold Koletzko
Cristina Campoy
NUTRIMENTHE Research Group
Universidad de Granada · ESBeta Technology Limited · GBInstitut d'Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili · ESErasmus MC · NLHelmholtz Zentrum München · DEMedical University of Warsaw · PLPepsi (United States) · USUnilever (Netherlands) · NLUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Surrey · GBUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence that early nutrition affects later cognitive performance. The idea that the diet of mothers, infants, and children could affect later mental performance has major implications for public health practice and policy development and for our understanding of human biology as well as for food product development, economic progress, and future wealth creation. To date, however, much of the evidence is from animal, retrospective studies and short-term nutritional intervention studies in humans. The positive effect of micronutrients on health, especially of pregnant women eating well to maximise their child's cognitive and behavioural outcomes, is commonly acknowledged. The current evidence of an association between gestational nutrition and brain development in healthy children is more credible for folate, n-3 fatty acids, and iron. Recent findings highlight the fact that single-nutrient supplementation is less adequate than supplementation with more complex formulae. However, the optimal content of micronutrient supplementation and whether there is a long-term impact on child's neurodevelopment needs to be investigated further. Moreover, it is also evident that future studies should take into account genetic heterogeneity when evaluating nutritional effects and also nutritional recommendations. The objective of the present review is to provide a background and update on the current knowledge linking nutrition to cognition and behaviour in children, and to show how the large collaborative European Project NUTRIMENTHE is working towards this aim.

Indexed as

Child Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaDietMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAdolescentBrainChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCognitionDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInfantMicronutrientsPregnancyPrenatal CareMicronutrients

Identifiers

PMID23884402
OpenAlexW1990570458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.