Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23883857›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2013

Neuropeptide S: a novel regulator of pain-related amygdala plasticity and behaviors.

Wenjie Ren, Takaki Kiritoshi, Stéphanie Grégoire, Guangchen Ji, Remo Guerrini, Girolamo Calo, Volker Neugebauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Amygdala Intercalated Cells: Gate Keepers and Conveyors of Internal State to the Circuits of Emotion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  9. A Role for Neuropeptide S in Alcohol and Cocaine Seeking.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Neural Circuit from Thalamic Paraventricular Nucleus to Central Amygdala for the Facilitation of Neuropathic Pain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wenjie RenDepartment of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas;
Takaki Kiritoshi
Stéphanie Grégoire
Guangchen Ji
Remo Guerrini
Girolamo Calo
Volker Neugebauer

Funding

VISCERAL PAINP01NS011255 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI NEUGEBAUER, VOLKER · 1985 to 2012
$13.6M
PAIN, NOCICEPTION, AND THE AMYGDALAR01NS038261 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI Volker Neugebauer, Igor Ponomarev · 1999 to 2026
$8.7M
Amygdala Serotonin Neurotransmission and Neuropathic PainR01NS081121 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI GREEN, THOMAS ARTHUR, NEUGEBAUER, VOLKER · 2013 to 2017
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS NS-081121NINDS NIH HHS NS-11255NINDS NIH HHS NS-38261NINDS NIH HHS P01 NS011255NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS038261NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081121
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amygdala plasticity is an important contributor to the emotional-affective dimension of pain. Recently discovered neuropeptide S (NPS) has anxiolytic properties through actions in the amygdala. Behavioral data also suggest antinociceptive effects of centrally acting NPS, but site and mechanism of action remain to be determined. This is the first electrophysiological analysis of pain-related NPS effects in the brain. We combined whole cell patch-clamp recordings in brain slices and behavioral assays to test the hypothesis that NPS activates synaptic inhibition of amygdala output to suppress pain behavior in an arthritis pain model. Recordings of neurons in the laterocapsular division of the central nucleus (CeLC), which serves pain-related amygdala output functions, show that NPS inhibited the enhanced excitatory drive [monosynaptic excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs)] from the basolateral amygdala (BLA) in the pain state. As shown by miniature EPSC analysis, the inhibitory effect of NPS did not involve direct postsynaptic action on CeLC neurons but rather a presynaptic, action potential-dependent network mechanism. Indeed, NPS increased external capsule (EC)-driven synaptic inhibition of CeLC neurons through PKA-dependent facilitatory postsynaptic action on a cluster of inhibitory intercalated (ITC) cells. NPS had no effect on BLA neurons. High-frequency stimulation (HFS) of excitatory EC inputs to ITC cells also inhibited synaptic activation of CeLC neurons, providing further evidence that ITC activation can control amygdala output. The cellular mechanisms by which EC-driven synaptic inhibition controls CeLC output remain to be determined. Administration of NPS into ITC, but not CeLC, also inhibited vocalizations and anxiety-like behavior in arthritic rats. A selective NPS receptor antagonist ([d-Cys(tBu)(5)]NPS) blocked electrophysiological and behavioral effects of NPS. Thus NPS is a novel tool to control amygdala output and pain-related affective behaviors through a direct action on inhibitory ITC cells.

Indexed as

AmygdalaAnimalsArthritis, ExperimentalExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsMaleMiniature Postsynaptic PotentialsNeuropeptidesNociceptionRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyNeuropeptidesneuropeptide S, ratamygdalaneuropeptide Spain behaviorsynaptic transmission

Identifiers

PMID23883857
PMCPMC3798934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.