Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23883781›Full record

ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Impact of a physician recommendation and parental immunization attitudes on receipt or intention to receive adolescent vaccines.

Lisa M Gargano, Natasha L Herbert, Julia E Painter, Jessica M Sales, Christopher Morfaw, Kimberly Rask, Dennis Murray, Ralph J DiClemente, James M Hughes

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 95 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Preexisting Chronic Health Conditions and Health Insurance Status Associated With Vaccine Receipt Among Adolescents.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2016
    Trial
  10. Human papillomavirus vaccination among adolescents in Georgia.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2015
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Lisa M GarganoEmory University; Atlanta, GA USA.
Natasha L HerbertEmory University; Atlanta, GA USA.
Julia E PainterEmory University; Atlanta, GA USA.
Jessica M SalesEmory University; Atlanta, GA USA.
Christopher MorfawEast Central Health District; Georgia Department of Public Health; Augusta, GA USA.
Kimberly RaskEmory University; Atlanta, GA USA.
Dennis MurrayGeorgia Regents University; Augusta, GA USA.
Ralph J DiClementeEmory University; Atlanta, GA USA.
James M HughesEmory University; Atlanta, GA USA.

Funding

Training a New Generation of VaccinologistsT32AI074492 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Rama Rao Amara, Benjamin A Lopman · 2009 to 2026
$6.4M
TRAINING IN IMMUNOLOGY AND MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIST32AI007610 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI EVAVOLD, BRIAN D · 2000 to 2014
$4.4M
Enhancing Adolescent Immunization through Parent and Teacher InterventionsU01IP000413 · IP · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HUGHES, JAMES M. · 2010 to 2013
$1.5M
Factors Associated with Teens' Non-Responsiveness to HIV InterventionK01MH085506 · NIMH · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI SALES, JESSICA A · 2009 to 2013
$686k
NCIRD CDC HHS 5UO1IP000413NCIRD CDC HHS U01 IP000413NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007610NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI074492NIAID NIH HHS T32AI074492NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH085506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four vaccines are recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices for adolescents. Parental attitudes may play a key role in vaccination uptake in this age group. In 2011, we conducted a cross-sectional survey among parents of adolescents in one county in Georgia to identify parental attitudes toward adolescent vaccination, reasons for vaccine acceptance or refusal, and impact of a physician recommendation for vaccination. Physician recommendation was reported as one of the top reasons for receipt or intent to receive any of the vaccines. Physician recommendation of any of the four vaccines was associated with receipt of Tdap (p<0.001), MCV4 (p<0.001), and HPV (p = 0.03) and intent to receive Tdap (p = 0.05), MCV4 (p = 0.005), and HPV (p = 0.05). Compared with parents who did not intend to have their adolescent vaccinated with any of the vaccines, parents who did intend reported higher perceived susceptibility (3.12 vs. 2.63, p = 0.03) and severity of disease (3.89 vs. 3.70, p = 0.02) and higher perceived benefit of vaccination (8.48 vs. 7.74, p = 0.02). These findings suggest that future vaccination efforts geared toward parents may benefit from addressing the advantages of vaccination and enhancing social norms. Physicians can play a key role by providing information on the benefits of adolescent vaccination.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAdolescentChildCross-Sectional StudiesDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesFemaleGeorgiaHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMeningococcal VaccinesPapillomavirus VaccinesParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVaccinationDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesMeningococcal VaccinesPapillomavirus Vaccinesadolescentattitudeshealth belief modeltheory of reasoned actionvaccine

Identifiers

PMID23883781
PMCPMC4162064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.