Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23883524›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2013

Abundance and distribution of transposable elements in two Drosophila QTL mapping resources.

Julie M Cridland, Stuart J Macdonald, Anthony D Long, Kevin R Thornton

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
88citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

88 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Polymorphic 3D genome architecture mediated by transposable elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Polymorphic transposable elements contribute to variation in recombination landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie M CridlandDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Physiology, University of California, Irvine.
Stuart J Macdonald
Anthony D Long
Kevin R Thornton
University of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Kansas · US

Funding

Biomedical Informatics Training ProgramT15LM007443 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI BALDI, PIERRE · 2002 to 2012
$9.3M
A resource for the genetic analysis of complex traitsR01OD010974 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS LAWRENCE · PI LONG, ANTHONY DOUGLAS, MACDONALD, STUART JOHN · 2012 to 2019
$3.1M
Population genetics of gene duplications and copy-number variants in the DrosophiR01GM085183 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI THORNTON, KEVIN R. · 2009 to 2013
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085183NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM085183NIH HHS R01 OD010974NIH HHS R01-OD010974NLM NIH HHS LM007443NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007443
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we present computational machinery to efficiently and accurately identify transposable element (TE) insertions in 146 next-generation sequenced inbred strains of Drosophila melanogaster. The panel of lines we use in our study is composed of strains from a pair of genetic mapping resources: the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) and the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource (DSPR). We identified 23,087 TE insertions in these lines, of which 83.3% are found in only one line. There are marked differences in the distribution of elements over the genome, with TEs found at higher densities on the X chromosome, and in regions of low recombination. We also identified many more TEs per base pair of intronic sequence and fewer TEs per base pair of exonic sequence than expected if TEs are located at random locations in the euchromatic genome. There was substantial variation in TE load across genes. For example, the paralogs derailed and derailed-2 show a significant difference in the number of TE insertions, potentially reflecting differences in the selection acting on these loci. When considering TE families, we find a very weak effect of gene family size on TE insertions per gene, indicating that as gene family size increases the number of TE insertions in a given gene within that family also increases. TEs are known to be associated with certain phenotypes, and our data will allow investigators using the DGRP and DSPR to assess the functional role of TE insertions in complex trait variation more generally. Notably, because most TEs are very rare and often private to a single line, causative TEs resulting in phenotypic differences among individuals may typically fail to replicate across mapping panels since individual elements are unlikely to segregate in both panels. Our data suggest that "burden tests" that test for the effect of TEs as a class may be more fruitful.

Indexed as

DNA Transposable ElementsQuantitative Trait LociAnimalsComputational BiologyDrosophila melanogasterEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenetic FitnessGenomeMaleModels, GeneticMultigene FamilyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideSelection, GeneticX ChromosomeDNA Transposable ElementsDGRPDSPRgenomicspopulation geneticstransposable element

Identifiers

PMID23883524
PMCPMC3773372
OpenAlexW2150621328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.