ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2013
Abundance and distribution of transposable elements in two Drosophila QTL mapping resources.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 88 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
88 citing papers in PubMed, 154 citations in OpenAlex.
- Structural variants are enriched in deleterious visible phenotypes inGenome research · 2026Article
- Influence of geography, seasonality and experimental selection on Chironomus riparius recombination rates.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Chromosomal Rearrangements and Transposable Elements in Locally Adapted Island Drosophila.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Polymorphic 3D genome architecture mediated by transposable elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Consequences of Unusually Large Pericentric TE-rich Regions in the Genome of a Neotropical Fig Wasp.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Genome Structural Variants Shape Adaptive Success of an Invasive Urban Malaria Vector Anopheles stephensi.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Polymorphic transposable elements contribute to variation in recombination landscapes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Transposable Element (TE) insertion predictions from RNAseq inputs and TE impact on RNA splicing and gene expression in Drosophila brain transcriptomes.Mobile DNA · 2024Article
- Varying recombination landscapes between individuals are driven by polymorphic transposable elements.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Chromosomal Inversions and the Demography of Speciation in Drosophila montana and Drosophila flavomontana.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Structural genomic variation in the inbred Scandinavian wolf population contributes to the realized genetic load but is positively affected by immigration.Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Structural genomic variation and migratory behavior in a wild songbird.Evolution letters · 2023Article
- ChimeraTE: a pipeline to detect chimeric transcripts derived from genes and transposable elements.Nucleic acids research · 2023Article
- Strong, Recent Selective Sweeps Reshape Genetic Diversity in Freshwater Bivalve Megalonaias nervosa.Molecular biology and evolution · 2023Article
- Recent transposable element bursts are associated with the proximity to genes in a fungal plant pathogen.PLoS pathogens · 2023Article
- Local assembly of long reads enables phylogenomics of transposable elements in a polyploid cell line.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Species-specific chromatin landscape determines how transposable elements shape genome evolution.eLife · 2022Article
- Ongoing transposition in cell culture reveals the phylogeny of diverse Drosophila S2 sublines.Genetics · 2022Article
- Dynamics and Impacts of Transposable Element Proliferation in the Drosophila nasuta Species Group Radiation.Molecular biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Population-scale long-read sequencing uncovers transposable elements associated with gene expression variation and adaptive signatures in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2022Article
28 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Here we present computational machinery to efficiently and accurately identify transposable element (TE) insertions in 146 next-generation sequenced inbred strains of Drosophila melanogaster. The panel of lines we use in our study is composed of strains from a pair of genetic mapping resources: the Drosophila Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP) and the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource (DSPR). We identified 23,087 TE insertions in these lines, of which 83.3% are found in only one line. There are marked differences in the distribution of elements over the genome, with TEs found at higher densities on the X chromosome, and in regions of low recombination. We also identified many more TEs per base pair of intronic sequence and fewer TEs per base pair of exonic sequence than expected if TEs are located at random locations in the euchromatic genome. There was substantial variation in TE load across genes. For example, the paralogs derailed and derailed-2 show a significant difference in the number of TE insertions, potentially reflecting differences in the selection acting on these loci. When considering TE families, we find a very weak effect of gene family size on TE insertions per gene, indicating that as gene family size increases the number of TE insertions in a given gene within that family also increases. TEs are known to be associated with certain phenotypes, and our data will allow investigators using the DGRP and DSPR to assess the functional role of TE insertions in complex trait variation more generally. Notably, because most TEs are very rare and often private to a single line, causative TEs resulting in phenotypic differences among individuals may typically fail to replicate across mapping panels since individual elements are unlikely to segregate in both panels. Our data suggest that "burden tests" that test for the effect of TEs as a class may be more fruitful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.