Trial reportBMC psychiatry2013
The effectiveness of individual placement and support for people with mental illness new on social benefits: a study protocol.
Trial report in BMC psychiatry, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Self-stigma as a barrier to recovery: a longitudinal study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2018Trial
- The key pillars of psychosocial disability: a European perspective on challenges and solutions.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Quality of residential facilities in Italy: satisfaction and quality of life of residents with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Performance and effectiveness of step progressive care pathways within mental health supported accommodation services in Italy.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2022Article
- Supported employment for people with severe mental illness: a pilot study of an Italian social enterprise with a special ingredient.BMC psychiatry · 2022Article
- Long-Term Effects of the Individual Placement and Support Intervention on Employment Status: 6-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2021Article
- Implementation of Individual Placement and Support in Italy: The Reggio Emilia Experience.Community mental health journal · 2020Article
- Self-stigma and suicidality: a longitudinal study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2017Article
- Job Maintenance through Supported Employment PLUS: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in public health · 2016Article
- Does "Individual Placement and Support" Satisfy the Users' Needs?Frontiers in public health · 2015Article
- Supported Employment for the Reintegration of Disability Pensioners with Mental Illnesses: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Frontiers in public health · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Switzerland, people with a severe mental illness and unable to work receive disability benefits ('IV-pension'). Once they are granted these benefits, the chances to regain competitive employment are usually small. However, previous studies have shown that individual placement and support (IPS) supports a successful reintegration into competitive employment. This study focuses on the integration of newly appointed IV-pensioners, who have received an IV-pension for less than a year. METHOD/
designThe present pilot project ZHEPP (Zürcher Eingliederungs-Pilot Projekt; engl.: Zurich integration pilot project) is a randomized controlled trial (RCT). The 250 participants will be randomized to either the intervention or the control group. The intervention group receives support of a job coach according to the approach of IPS. Participants in the control group do not receive IPS support. Participation takes a total of two years for each participant. Each group is interviewed every six months (T0-T4). A two-factor analysis of variance will be conducted with the two factors group (intervention versus control group) and outcome (employment yes/no). The main criterion of the two-factor analysis will be the number of competitive employment contracts in each group. DISCUSSION: This study will focus on the impact of IPS on new IV-pensioners and aims to identify predictors for a successful integration. Furthermore, we will examine the effect of IPS on stigma variables and recovery orientation.
trial registrationISRCTN54951166.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.