Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23882409›Full record

ArticleF1000prime reports2013

Stage-specific epigenetic gene silencing during thymocyte lineage commitment.

Ichiro Taniuchi

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F1000prime reports, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ichiro TaniuchiLaboratory for Transcriptional Regulation, RCAI, RIKEN Centre for Integrative Medical Sciences (IMS-RCAI) 1-7-22, Suehiro-cho, Tsurumi-ku, Yokohama, 230-0045 Japan.
RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During lineage commitment, precursor cells must establish their signature gene expression programs to endow them with the requisite set of cellular functions. To maintain cellular identity, the gene expression program must be inherited stably by progeny of lineage-committed cells. Epigenetic regulation serves as a central mechanism to maintain such cellular memory. Although a lot of progress has been made in the last decade towards defining the spectrum of epigenetic modifications on histones and DNA, as well as the relevant enzymatic machinery, the mechanisms by which these modifiers are controlled during development remain poorly understood. Gene regulation at the Cd4 and Thpok loci provides ideal models for developmentally regulated gene silencing. A single transcriptional silencer at each locus establishes heritable, irreversible epigenetic silencing only in lineage-committed cells, whereas the same silencer elements establish a reversible repressive state in precursor cells. The dynamic versus permanent silencing of developmentally regulated loci by the stage-specific functions of silencers will be discussed in the context of cell lineage commitment.

Identifiers

PMID23882409
PMCPMC3708425
OpenAlexW2313586770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.