ArticleFrontiers in psychology2013
Fixations on objects in natural scenes: dissociating importance from salience.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Virtual Environmental Cues on Quiet Stance in Young Adults.Human factors · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Objects are selected for attention based upon meaning during passive scene viewing.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2023Article
- Attention and schema violations of real world scenes differentially modulate time perception.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Searching for meaning: Local scene semantics guide attention during natural visual search in scenes.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2023Article
- Article
- Weighting the factors affecting attention guidance during free viewing and visual search: The unexpected role of object recognition uncertainty.Journal of vision · 2022Article
- Deep saliency models learn low-, mid-, and high-level features to predict scene attention.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Meaning maps capture the density of local semantic features in scenes: A reply to Pedziwiatr, Kümmerer, Wallis, Bethge & Teufel (2021).Cognition · 2021Article
- Turning the (virtual) world around: Patterns in saccade direction vary with picture orientation and shape in virtual reality.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Gaze and the Control of Foot Placement When Walking in Natural Terrain.Current biology : CB · 2018Article
- Semantic content outweighs low-level saliency in determining children's and adults' fixation of movies.Journal of experimental child psychology · 2018Article
- Salient object changes influence overt attentional prioritization and object-based targeting in natural scenes.PloS one · 2017Article
- Modeling peripheral visual acuity enables discovery of gaze strategies at multiple time scales during natural scene search.Journal of vision · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The relation of selective attention to understanding of natural scenes has been subject to intense behavioral research and computational modeling, and gaze is often used as a proxy for such attention. The probability of an image region to be fixated typically correlates with its contrast. However, this relation does not imply a causal role of contrast. Rather, contrast may relate to an object's "importance" for a scene, which in turn drives attention. Here we operationalize importance by the probability that an observer names the object as characteristic for a scene. We modify luminance contrast of either a frequently named ("common"/"important") or a rarely named ("rare"/"unimportant") object, track the observers' eye movements during scene viewing and ask them to provide keywords describing the scene immediately after. When no object is modified relative to the background, important objects draw more fixations than unimportant ones. Increases of contrast make an object more likely to be fixated, irrespective of whether it was important for the original scene, while decreases in contrast have little effect on fixations. Any contrast modification makes originally unimportant objects more important for the scene. Finally, important objects are fixated more centrally than unimportant objects, irrespective of contrast. Our data suggest a dissociation between object importance (relevance for the scene) and salience (relevance for attention). If an object obeys natural scene statistics, important objects are also salient. However, when natural scene statistics are violated, importance and salience are differentially affected. Object salience is modulated by the expectation about object properties (e.g., formed by context or gist), and importance by the violation of such expectations. In addition, the dependence of fixated locations within an object on the object's importance suggests an analogy to the effects of word frequency on landing positions in reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.