Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23882213›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2013

Rapid, parallel path planning by propagating wavefronts of spiking neural activity.

Filip Ponulak, John J Hopfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Brain inspired path planning algorithms for drones.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Temporal State Machines: Using Temporal Memory to Stitch Time-based Graph Computations.ACM journal on emerging technologies in computing systems · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Toward an Integration of Deep Learning and Neuroscience.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2016
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A computational model for preplay in the hippocampus.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Filip PonulakBrain Corporation San Diego, CA, USA ; Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University Princeton, NJ, USA.
John J Hopfield

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient path planning and navigation is critical for animals, robotics, logistics and transportation. We study a model in which spatial navigation problems can rapidly be solved in the brain by parallel mental exploration of alternative routes using propagating waves of neural activity. A wave of spiking activity propagates through a hippocampus-like network, altering the synaptic connectivity. The resulting vector field of synaptic change then guides a simulated animal to the appropriate selected target locations. We demonstrate that the navigation problem can be solved using realistic, local synaptic plasticity rules during a single passage of a wavefront. Our model can find optimal solutions for competing possible targets or learn and navigate in multiple environments. The model provides a hypothesis on the possible computational mechanisms for optimal path planning in the brain, at the same time it is useful for neuromorphic implementations, where the parallelism of information processing proposed here can fully be harnessed in hardware.

Indexed as

hippocampusmental explorationnavigationneuromorphic systemsparallel processingpath planningspike timing dependent plasticitywave propagation

Identifiers

PMID23882213
PMCPMC3714542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.