ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2013
Modulation of epileptic activity by deep brain stimulation: a model-based study of frequency-dependent effects.
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ion dynamics underlying the seizure delay effect of low-frequency electrical stimulation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Frequency-specific alterations in brain connectivity induced by pulvinar stimulation.Epilepsia · 2025Article
- Computational modeling of frequency-dependent neocortical response to thalamic neurostimulation in epilepsy.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Modeling and Parameter Analysis of Basic Single Channel Neuron Mass Model for SSVEP.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Localization of the epileptogenic network from scalp EEG using a patient-specific whole-brain model.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- The role of the thalamus in focal human epilepsy: insights from stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG).Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Bidirectional Neuronal Control of Epileptiform Activity by Repetitive Transcranial Focused Ultrasound Stimulations.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Network-motif delay differential analysis of brain activity during seizures.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Design of Closed-Loop Control Schemes Based on the GA-PID and GA-RBF-PID Algorithms for Brain Dynamic Modulation.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Neuroprosthetics: from sensorimotor to cognitive disorders.Communications biology · 2023Review
- Brain stimulation treatments in epilepsy: Basic mechanisms and clinical advances.Biomedical journal · 2022Review
- Inducing neuroplasticity through intracranial θ-burst stimulation in the human sensorimotor cortex.Journal of neurophysiology · 2021Article
- Adiabatic dynamic causal modelling.NeuroImage · 2021Article
- Active probing to highlight approaching transitions to ictal states in coupled neural mass models.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Amygdala Low-Frequency Stimulation Reduces Pathological Phase-Amplitude Coupling in the Pilocarpine Model of Epilepsy.Brain sciences · 2020Article
- COALIA: A Computational Model of Human EEG for Consciousness Research.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2019Article
- A neural mass model of cross frequency coupling.PloS one · 2017Article
- Prediction of the Seizure Suppression Effect by Electrical Stimulation via a Computational Modeling Approach.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2017Article
- Eliminating Absence Seizures through the Deep Brain Stimulation to Thalamus Reticular Nucleus.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A number of studies showed that deep brain stimulation (DBS) can modulate the activity in the epileptic brain and that a decrease of seizures can be achieved in "responding" patients. In most of these studies, the choice of stimulation parameters is critical to obtain desired clinical effects. In particular, the stimulation frequency is a key parameter that is difficult to tune. A reason is that our knowledge about the frequency-dependant mechanisms according to which DBS indirectly impacts the dynamics of pathological neuronal systems located in the neocortex is still limited. We address this issue using both computational modeling and intracerebral EEG (iEEG) data. We developed a macroscopic (neural mass) model of the thalamocortical network. In line with already-existing models, it includes interconnected neocortical pyramidal cells and interneurons, thalamocortical cells and reticular neurons. The novelty was to introduce, in the thalamic compartment, the biophysical effects of direct stimulation. Regarding clinical data, we used a quite unique data set recorded in a patient (drug-resistant epilepsy) with a focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). In this patient, DBS strongly reduced the sustained epileptic activity of the FCD for low-frequency (LFS, < 2 Hz) and high-frequency stimulation (HFS, > 70 Hz) while intermediate-frequency stimulation (IFS, around 50 Hz) had no effect. Signal processing, clustering, and optimization techniques allowed us to identify the necessary conditions for reproducing, in the model, the observed frequency-dependent stimulation effects. Key elements which explain the suppression of epileptic activity in the FCD include: (a) feed-forward inhibition and synaptic short-term depression of thalamocortical connections at LFS, and (b) inhibition of the thalamic output at HFS. Conversely, modeling results indicate that IFS favors thalamic oscillations and entrains epileptic dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.