Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23882169›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2013

Developing an active implementation model for a chronic disease management program.

Margrethe Smidth, Morten Bondo Christensen, Frede Olesen, Peter Vedsted

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01228708 (Effects of an Active Implementation of a Chronic Disease Management Programme for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01228708 nacompletednot on this map

Effects of an Active Implementation of a Chronic Disease Management Programme for Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AarhusRan2009 to 2011Enrolled3,021ConditionsImplementation of a Chronic Disease Management Programme, COPDArmsActive implementation of a guideline for chronic disease
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Does Telecare Improve Interorganisational Collaboration?International journal of integrated care · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Margrethe SmidthThe Research Unit for General Practice Aarhus and The Section for General Medicine, Institute of Public Health, Bartholins Allé 2, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Morten Bondo Christensen
Frede Olesen
Peter Vedsted
Aarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntroduction and diffusion of new disease management programs in healthcare is usually slow, but active theory-driven implementation seems to outperform other implementation strategies. However, we have only scarce evidence on the feasibility and real effect of such strategies in complex primary care settings where municipalities, general practitioners and hospitals should work together. The Central Denmark Region recently implemented a disease management program for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) which presented an opportunity to test an active implementation model against the usual implementation model. The aim of the present paper is to describe the development of an active implementation model using the Medical Research Council's model for complex interventions and the Chronic Care Model.

methodsWe used the Medical Research Council's five-stage model for developing complex interventions to design an implementation model for a disease management program for COPD. First, literature on implementing change in general practice was scrutinised and empirical knowledge was assessed for suitability. In phase I, the intervention was developed; and in phases II and III, it was tested in a block- and cluster-randomised study. In phase IV, we evaluated the feasibility for others to use our active implementation model.

resultsThe Chronic Care Model was identified as a model for designing efficient implementation elements. These elements were combined into a multifaceted intervention, and a timeline for the trial in a randomised study was decided upon in accordance with the five stages in the Medical Research Council's model; this was captured in a PaTPlot, which allowed us to focus on the structure and the timing of the intervention. The implementation strategies identified as efficient were use of the Breakthrough Series, academic detailing, provision of patient material and meetings between providers. The active implementation model was tested in a randomised trial (results reported elsewhere).

conclusionThe combination of the theoretical model for complex interventions and the Chronic Care Model and the chosen specific implementation strategies proved feasible for a practice-based active implementation model for a chronic-disease-management-program for COPD. Using the Medical Research Council's model added transparency to the design phase which further facilitated the process of implementing the program.

trial registrationhttp://www.clinicaltrials.gov/(NCT01228708).

Indexed as

Breakthrough SeriesChronic Care ModelDenmarkdisease managementimplementationPaTPlot

Identifiers

PMID23882169
PMCPMC3718271
OpenAlexW1951810661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.