Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23882162›Full record

ArticleFuture neurology2013

Advances in the treatment of visual hallucinations in neurodegenerative diseases.

Daniel Collerton, John-Paul Taylor

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Future neurology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FDG-PET assessment and metabolic patterns in Lafora disease.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel CollertonNorthumberland, Tyne & Wear NHS Foundation Trust & Newcastle University, Bensham Hospital, Gateshead, NE8 4YL, UK.
John-Paul Taylor
Newcastle University · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust 088441
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of visual hallucinations in neurodegenerative disorders is not well advanced. The complexity of underlying mechanisms presents a number of potential avenues for developing treatments, but also suggests that any single one may be of limited efficacy. Reducing medication, with the careful introduction of antidementia medication if needed, is the mainstay of current management. Antipsychotic medication leads to excessive morbidity and mortality and should only be used in cases of high distress that do not otherwise respond. Education, reduction of risk factors and psychological treatments have limited evidence of efficacy, but are unlikely to cause harm.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseamyloidopathyLewy bodyParkinson’s diseasesynucleinopathytauopathytreatmentvisual hallucination

Identifiers

PMID23882162
PMCPMC3717328
OpenAlexW2020452672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.