ArticleDiabetes care2013
Individualization of antihypertensive drug treatment.
Article in Diabetes care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- β1-adrenergic receptor polymorphisms: a possible genetic predictor of bisoprolol response in acute coronary syndrome.Future science OA · 2023Article
- Lack of Effects of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Activity and Beta-Adrenoceptor Pathway Polymorphisms on the Response to Bisoprolol in Hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical data analysis of telmisartan for hypertension management in Indian population.Bioinformation · 2021Article
- Optimization of an Extraction Solvent for Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Achievement of individualized treatment targets in patients with comorbid type-2 diabetes and hypertension: 6 months results of the DIALOGUE registry.BMC endocrine disorders · 2015Observational
- Hypertension: Strengths and limitations of the JNC 8 hypertension guidelines.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2014Article
- Trends in antihypertensive drug utilization in British Columbia, 2004-2019: a descriptive study.CMAJ openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.