Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23882041›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2013

Do we still need pioglitazone for the treatment of type 2 diabetes? A risk-benefit critique in 2013.

Guntram Schernthaner, Craig J Currie, Gerit-Holger Schernthaner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. [Geriatric aspects of diabetes mellitus (Update 2026)].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Diabetes and SGLT2 Inhibitors in Cerebrovascular Diseases.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Choroidal Thickening Induced by Pioglitazone in Diabetic Patients.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Pioglitazone in diabetic kidney disease: forgotten but not gone.Archives of medical sciences. Atherosclerotic diseases · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Guntram SchernthanerDepartment of Medicine I, Rudolfstiftung Hospital, Vienna, Austria. guntram.schernthaner@meduniwien.ac.at
Craig J Currie
Gerit-Holger Schernthaner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCardiovascular DiseasesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHumansHypoglycemiaHypoglycemic AgentsPioglitazoneRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsThiazolidinedionesBiomarkersHypoglycemic AgentsPioglitazoneThiazolidinediones

Identifiers

PMID23882041
PMCPMC3920795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.