Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23882024›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2013

Molecular responses of mouse macrophages to copper and copper oxide nanoparticles inferred from proteomic analyses.

Sarah Triboulet, Catherine Aude-Garcia, Marie Carrière, Hélène Diemer, Fabienne Proamer, Aurélie Habert, Mireille Chevallet, Véronique Collin-Faure, Jean-Marc Strub, Daniel Hanau and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Recent Trends in Biomedical Applications of CuInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Effects of Iron Oxide Nanoparticles (γ-FeInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah TribouletPro-MD team, Laboratoire de Chimie et Biologie des Métaux, UMR CNRS-CEA-UJF, Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble 38054, France;
Catherine Aude-Garcia
Marie Carrière
Hélène Diemer
Fabienne Proamer
Aurélie Habert
Mireille Chevallet
Véronique Collin-Faure
Jean-Marc Strub
Daniel Hanau
Alain Van Dorsselaer
Nathalie Herlin-Boime
Thierry Rabilloud
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRInserm · FRLaboratoire de Chimie et Biologie des Métaux · FRCEA Grenoble · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The molecular responses of macrophages to copper-based nanoparticles have been investigated via a combination of proteomic and biochemical approaches, using the RAW264.7 cell line as a model. Both metallic copper and copper oxide nanoparticles have been tested, with copper ion and zirconium oxide nanoparticles used as controls. Proteomic analysis highlighted changes in proteins implicated in oxidative stress responses (superoxide dismutases and peroxiredoxins), glutathione biosynthesis, the actomyosin cytoskeleton, and mitochondrial proteins (especially oxidative phosphorylation complex subunits). Validation studies employing functional analyses showed that the increases in glutathione biosynthesis and in mitochondrial complexes observed in the proteomic screen were critical to cell survival upon stress with copper-based nanoparticles; pharmacological inhibition of these two pathways enhanced cell vulnerability to copper-based nanoparticles, but not to copper ions. Furthermore, functional analyses using primary macrophages derived from bone marrow showed a decrease in reduced glutathione levels, a decrease in the mitochondrial transmembrane potential, and inhibition of phagocytosis and of lipopolysaccharide-induced nitric oxide production. However, only a fraction of these effects could be obtained with copper ions. In conclusion, this study showed that macrophage functions are significantly altered by copper-based nanoparticles. Also highlighted are the cellular pathways modulated by cells for survival and the exemplified cross-toxicities that can occur between copper-based nanoparticles and pharmacological agents.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell LineCells, CulturedCopperGlutathioneMacrophagesMembrane Potential, MitochondrialMetal NanoparticlesMiceMitochondrial ProteinsNitric OxideOxidative StressPhagocytosisProteomicsSignal TransductionCoppercuprous oxideGlutathioneMitochondrial ProteinsNitric Oxide

Identifiers

PMID23882024
PMCPMC3820927
OpenAlexW2115596383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.