ReviewDrugs2013
Eplerenone: a review of its use in patients with chronic systolic heart failure and mild symptoms.
Review in Drugs, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on glucose homeostasis.Medicine · 2017Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Eplerenone vs Spironolactone on Left Ventricular Systolic Function, Hospitalization and Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure-HFrEF.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2023Trial
- Analysis of eplerenone in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database: a focus on overall patient population and gender-specific subgroups.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Article
- Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization of the Process-Related Impurities of Eplerenone, an Antihypertensive Drug.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Eplerenone (Inspra®) is a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). In the EU, it is approved for use (in addition to standard optimal therapy) to reduce the risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and morbidity in adult patients with chronic systolic heart failure (HF) and mild symptoms. This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of eplerenone in this indication and briefly summarizes its pharmacology. In the EMPHASIS-HF study, relative to placebo, the addition of eplerenone to optimal background therapy significantly reduced the risk of death from CV causes or hospitalization for HF in patients with chronic systolic HF and mild symptoms. Benefits of eplerenone therapy over placebo were also observed in several secondary outcomes, including: death from any cause or hospitalization for HF; death from any cause; hospitalization for any reason; or hospitalization for HF. Eplerenone was generally well tolerated in this study, with the most frequent adverse event being hyperkalaemia, which is a known adverse event of the drug class. Sexual adverse events (e.g. gynecomastia) occurred in <1 % of eplerenone recipients, reflecting the selectivity of eplerenone for mineralocorticoid receptors. Based on these results, European guidelines have been updated and recommend the use of an MRA to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and premature death in all patients with persisting symptoms (New York Heart Association class II-IV) and a left-ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35 %, despite treatment with ACE inhibitor (or an angiotensin receptor blocker if an ACE inhibitor is not tolerated) and a β-blocker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.