Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23881525›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2013

High carbonate level of apatite in kidney stones implies infection, but is it predictive?

Kate M Englert, James A McAteer, James E Lingeman, James C Williams

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Evaluating factors that dictate struvite stone composition: A multi-institutional clinical experience from the EDGE Research Consortium.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kate M EnglertDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive MS 5055Y, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-5120, USA.
James A McAteer
James E Lingeman
James C Williams
Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USHouston Methodist · USIndiana University School of Medicine

Funding

SWL AND RENAL INJURY AND STONE COMMINUTIONP01DK043881 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI WILLIAMS, JAMES C · 1994 to 2023
$33.5M
STONE FORMATION IN GENETIC HYPERCALCIURIAP01DK056788 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI WILLIAMS, JAMES C · 2000 to 2021
$22.5M
The Structural Basis of Kidney Stone FragilityR01DK059933 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIV-PURDUE UNIV AT INDIANAPOLIS · PI WILLIAMS, JAMES C · 2004 to 2011
$2.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK043881NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK056788NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK059933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of infectious microorganisms in urinary stones is commonly inferred from stone composition, especially by the presence of struvite in a stone. The presence of highly carbonated apatite has also been proposed as a marker of the presence of bacteria within a stone. We retrospectively studied 368 patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), and who also had culture results for both stone and urine. Urine culture showed no association with stone mineral content, but stone culture was more often positive in struvite-containing stones (73 % positive) and majority apatite stones (65 %) than in other stone types (54 %, lower than the others, P < 0.02). In 51 patients in whom the carbonate content of apatite could be measured, carbonate in the apatite was weakly predictive of positive stone culture with an optimal cutoff value of 13.5 % carbonate (sensitivity 0.61, specificity 0.80). In positive cultures of stones (all mineral types combined), organisms that characteristically produce urease were present in 71 % of the cases, with no difference in this proportion among different types of stone. In summary, the type of mineral in the stone was predictive of positive stone culture, but this correlation is imperfect, as over half of non-struvite, non-apatite stones were found to harbor culturable organisms. We conclude that mineral type is an inadequate predictor of whether a stone contains infectious organisms, and that stone culture is more likely to provide information useful to the management of patients undergoing PCNL.

Indexed as

ApatitesHumansKidney CalculiMagnesium CompoundsNephrostomy, PercutaneousPhosphatesRetrospective StudiesStruviteUrinary Tract InfectionsApatitescarboapatiteMagnesium CompoundsPhosphatesStruvite

Identifiers

PMID23881525
PMCPMC3778144
OpenAlexW2095038416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.