Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23881401›Full record

Observational studyHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2014

Single centre observational study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the Proceed™ Ventral Patch to repair small ventral hernias.

J Bontinck, I Kyle-Leinhase, P Pletinckx, V Vergucht, R Beckers, F Muysoms

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01307696 (Multicenter Prospective Clinical Registry To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of A Self-Expanding Multi-Layered Partially Resorbable Absorbable Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh Device), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01307696 completednot on this map

Multicenter Prospective Clinical Registry To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of A Self-Expanding Multi-Layered Partially Resorbable Absorbable Lightweight Polypropylene Mesh Device (Proceed Ventral Patch® Or Pvp®) For The Treatment Of Small And Medium Umbilical Ventral Hernias

TypeobservationalSponsorAlgemeen Ziekenhuis Maria MiddelaresRan2010 to 2014Enrolled100ConditionsUmbilical Hernia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Umbilical hernia repair with composite prosthesis: a single-centre experience.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2019
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Infection and recurrence rates of the C-QUR V-PatchHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018
    Observational
  5. Article
  6. Intraperitoneal mesh devices for small midline hernias: mesh behavior in a porcine model.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J BontinckDepartment of Surgery, AZ Maria Middelares, Kortrijksesteenweg 1026, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
I Kyle-Leinhase
P Pletinckx
V Vergucht
R Beckers
F Muysoms

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is evidence that mesh repair for primary umbilical hernias results in less recurrences and similar wound complication rates compared to tissue repair. In recent years, several mesh devices for the repair of small ventral hernias have been developed, but some reports have been published on serious complications and adverse effects encountered with those mesh devices.

methodsThe Proceed™ Ventral Patch (PVP™) is a partially absorbable lightweight polypropylene mesh. We introduced PVP™ in our department in April 2009 and collected patient data and outcome in an observational study of 101 consecutive patients until December 2011 (Clinical.Trials.gov: NCT01307696). In addition to the routine control 3 weeks postoperative, prospective follow-up included a questionnaire, clinical investigation and ultrasound after 12 months.

resultsThe study included 91 primary (76 umbilical/15 epigastric) and 10 incisional ventral hernias (including 6 trocar hernias). In all patients a PVP™ with a diameter of 6.4 cm was used. Wound problems were the most frequent complication (n = 18). Follow-up of at least 12 months was achieved in 98 patients (97 %) and the mean follow-up time was 15.9 months. Follow-up by clinical examination diagnosed a recurrence in 11/92 patients (12.0 %). Only four patients were aware of their recurrent hernia, the seven others reported no problems in the questionnaire. The additional ultrasound performed did not reveal recurrences that were not already diagnosed by clinical examination. In five patients a reoperation for repair of the recurrence was performed (reoperation rate 5/98 = 5.1 %). Hernia defect size (p = 0.032) and type of hernia (p = 0.029) were found to be a significant risk factors for development of a recurrent hernia (Fisher's exact test). Hernia size was a significant risk factor both in a univariate (p = 0.005) and in a multivariate Cox model (p = 0.017). Incisional hernia was of borderline significance in a univariate (p = 0.047) and in a multivariate Cox model (p = 0.08).

conclusionIntensive clinical follow-up yields a high percentage (12.0 %) of clinically proven, but often asymptomatic recurrences after repair of small ventral hernias with the PVP™. Reoperation rate for recurrence was 5.1 %. Hernia defect size is a significant risk factor for recurrence. Therefore, we recommend using the PVP™ only for primary ventral hernias smaller than 2 cm. For larger or incisional hernias other techniques allowing the use of larger meshes is advocated.

Indexed as

Surgical MeshAdultAgedFemaleHernia, VentralHumansMaleMiddle AgedPolypropylenesProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomePolypropylenes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.