Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23881063›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2013

Simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasties do not lead to higher complication or allogeneic transfusion rates compared to unilateral procedures.

Sergio Romagnoli, Sara Zacchetti, Paolo Perazzo, Francesco Verde, Giuseppe Banfi, Marco Viganò

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Simultaneous vs staged bilateral hip arthroplasty: monocentric analysis of satisfaction rate and complications.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Observational
  3. Similar complication and readmission rates following simultaneous versus staged bilateral total hip arthroplasty.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. One-stage versus 2-stage bilateral total joint arthroplasty: a matched cohort study.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sergio RomagnoliIRCCS Galeazzi Orthopaedic Institute, via R. Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
Sara Zacchetti
Paolo Perazzo
Francesco Verde
Giuseppe Banfi
Marco Viganò
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAbout 20 % of patients undergoing a primary total hip arthroplasty could undergo a second contralateral procedure within five years. The possibility to perform simultaneous bilateral hip replacements instead of two-stage surgery could reduce hospitalisation time and patient management costs, but concerns exist because of risks related to massive blood loss and possible increase in complication rates. The purpose of this study is to assess the veracity of these concerns.

methodsParameters like blood loss, transfused blood units, total hospital length of stay (surgical and rehabilitation) and presence of in-hospital complications were collected from surgery reports of two different groups of patients. The first group comprised patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty (n = 63), while the second group consisted of patients undergoing unilateral surgery (n = 97). Occurrence of complications within six post-operative months was assessed by phone interview.

resultsNo differences were observed in complication, revision and mortality rates between the study groups. On the contrary, blood loss was significantly higher in the bilateral group, but the application of appropriate transfusion protocols reduced the use of allogeneic blood transfusion to the levels recorded for unilateral patients. Moreover, the difference in length of hospital stay (about two days) between the two groups was not clinically relevant.

conclusionsOur data show that simultaneous bilateral procedures do not lead to higher complication or allogeneic transfusion rates in comparison to unilateral hip replacement, and that, in cases of bilateral disease, they could significantly reduce the total length of hospital stay and, therefore, patient management costs.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipBlood TransfusionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHipHumansIncidenceInterviews as TopicLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care ManagementPostoperative Complications

Identifiers

PMID23881063
PMCPMC3824890
OpenAlexW2094587345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.