Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23878701›Full record

ArticleAfrican journal of infectious diseases2011

Sensitivity of microscopy compared to molecular diagnosis of p. Falciparum: implications on malaria treatment in epidemic areas in kenya.

Laura Nyawira Wangai, Muriira Geoffrey Karau, Paul Nthakanio Njiruh, Omar Sabah, Francis Thuo Kimani, Gabriel Magoma, Njagi Kiambo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in African journal of infectious diseases, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. First molecular evidence of hemotropicOpen veterinary journal · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Multiple blood pathogen infections in apparently healthy sheltered dogs in southern Thailand.International journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Nyawira WangaiInstitute of Tropical Medicine and Infectious Diseases (ITROMID), P.O. Box 54840-00200 Nairobi, Kenya ; Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), Biochemistry Department, P.O. Box 62000-00200, Nairobi, Kenya.
Muriira Geoffrey Karau
Paul Nthakanio Njiruh
Omar Sabah
Francis Thuo Kimani
Gabriel Magoma
Njagi Kiambo
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KEJomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology · KEKenya Bureau of StandardsTechnical University of Kenya · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of Plasmodium species by microscopy has been the gold standard for diagnosis of malaria for more than a century. Despite the fact that there is a significant decline in the number of positive cases reported from microscopy, antimalarial drugs prescriptions are on continuous increase as patients present with symptoms of malaria. This makes it difficult to establish accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of light microscopy in diagnosis of malaria in epidemic areas. This study was designed to compare microscopy with polymerase chain reaction as diagnostic methods for malaria in three epidemic areas in Kenya. A total of 356 patients presenting with malaria symptoms were diagnosed by microscopy and dried blood filter paper spots were collected from patient in Kisii, West Pokot and Narok districts. Plasmodium falciparum DNA was extracted from the dried blood filter samples. Primers specific for the Plasmodium Species were designed and used in a two step amplification of the Pfmdr gene. The PCR products were analyzed in ethidium bromide stained 1.5% agarose gel. It was found that 72 out of 350 specimens diagnosed as negative were positive for P. falciparum by nested PCR, while 6 which were microscopy positive were confirmed so by nested PCR. This study demonstrates that there is a high level of misdiagnosis which may either lead to denial for deserved treatment or undeserved treatment. Nested PCR detection of malaria parasites is a very useful complement to microscopy although it is expensive and takes long time. Additionally, smear negative patients suspected to have malaria should be subjected to PCR diagnosis to improve rational drug use. The economic burden of misdiagnosis and mistreatment of malaria outweighs that of PCR diagnosis, hence this diagnostic mode could be tenable in the long run even in rural areas.

Indexed as

diagnosisepidemicsmicroscopyPlasmodium falciparumpolymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID23878701
PMCPMC3497842
OpenAlexW2075040633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.