Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23877953›Full record

ArticleJournal of community health2014

Assessment of Tdap administration rates from 2009 to 2012 at a large urban nonteaching hospital.

Eric Wombwell, Whitney Palecek, Elizabeth Englin, Tinh Nguyen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric WombwellDivision of Pharmacy Practice and Administration, School of Pharmacy, University of Missouri-Kansas City, 2464 Charlotte Street, Kansas City, MO, 64108-2718, USA, wombwelle@umkc.edu.
Whitney Palecek
Elizabeth Englin
Tinh Nguyen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the significant rise in pertussis cases reported in 2012, these authors investigated the tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine administration at our institution from 2009 to 2012 to determine if changes in prescribing practices reflected published updates from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). A single large, urban, private, non-teaching hospital. Documented Tdap vaccines administered from January 2009 through December 2012 were retrieved using an electronic data pull. The incidence of Tdap vaccine administration was reported as number of events per 1,000 patient visits. This data pull served to provide the longitudinal context to prescribing pattern changes at our facility, which were then compared to ACIP vaccination recommendation changes. Tdap administrations increased from 1,365 vaccinations in 2009 to 3,048 vaccinations in 2012. Tdap vaccine administration increased significantly each successive year from 2009 to 2012 from 23.96 ± 1.25 to 47.15 ± 1.63 vaccines per 1,000 patient visits to the facility. Confidence intervals did not overlap for consecutive years representing statistically significant differences between vaccination rates from year to year. Review of Tdap administrations demonstrates a clear and significant increase over consecutive years from 2009 to 2012. Over this time period there were no institutional initiatives aimed at increasing appropriate Tdap use at our institution. This study suggests a correlation between ACIP vaccination recommendations and provider prescribing of Tdap, although no definitive association can be made.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis VaccinesGuideline AdherenceHospitals, UrbanHumansDiphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.