ReviewClinical reviews in allergy & immunology2014
Historical perspectives in the diagnosis and treatment of primary immune deficiencies.
Review in Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in ARPC1B Deficiency.Journal of clinical immunology · 2022Article
- Assessment of weight and height of patients with primary immunodeficiency disorders and group of children with recurrent respiratory tract infections.BMC immunology · 2020Article
- Primary immunodeficiencies in Central and Eastern Europe-the power of networking Report on the activity of the Jeffrey Modell Foundation Centers Network in Central and Eastern Europe.Immunologic research · 2019Article
- Fcγ Receptor Heterogeneity in Leukocyte Functional Responses.Frontiers in immunology · 2017Review
- Autoimmunity in 2014.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The field of Primary Immune Deficiency Disorders (PIDD) has advanced rapidly over the past several years with over 200 different gene mutations defined. With the recent institution of newborn screening for T cell deficiencies in many states and earlier recognition of the signs and symptoms of patients with immune deficiency, it is now apparent that PIDD is not as "rare" as was originally thought several decades ago. With the earlier recognition of patients with recurrent infections and various immune perturbations, advancements in the treatment of these immune deficiency disorders have led to enhanced survival and quality of life. In this issue, the diagnosis of PIDD through laboratory testing and skin manifestations is reviewed. The more recently described cellular immune deficiencies, selective immune deficiencies, and advances in the use of bone marrow transplantation in the correction of some of these immune deficiencies are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.