Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23877609›Full record

ReviewLab animal2013

Using anesthetics and analgesics in experimental traumatic brain injury.

Rachel K Rowe, Jordan L Harrison, Theresa C Thomas, James R Pauly, P David Adelson, Jonathan Lifshitz

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Delivering Traumatic Brain Injury to Larval Zebrafish.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Increasing Rigor of Preclinical Research to Maximize Opportunities for Translation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Propofol effects in rodent models of traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Rachel K RoweBarrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Jordan L Harrison
Theresa C Thomas
James R Pauly
P David Adelson
Jonathan Lifshitz
University of Arizona · USBarrow Neurological Institute · USPhoenix Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

Neural circuit disruption by diffuse brain injury: basis for morbidity & therapyR01NS065052 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LIFSHITZ, JONATHAN · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
The Combination of Cyclosporin and Choline Optimizes Outcomes In Focal and DiffusR01HD061996 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI PAULY, JAMES R · 2009 to 2011
$828k
Post Traumatic Sleep: An Individualized Indicator of Severity and RecoveryR21NS072611 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LIFSHITZ, JONATHAN, O'HARA, BRUCE FREDERICK · 2011 to 2012
$408k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061996NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS065052NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS072611
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Valid modeling of traumatic brain injury (TBI) requires accurate replication of both the mechanical forces that cause the primary injury and the conditions that lead to secondary injuries observed in human patients. The use of animals in TBI research is justified by the lack of in vitro or computer models that can sufficiently replicate the complex pathological processes involved. Measures to reduce nociception and distress must be implemented, but the administration of anesthetics and analgesics can influence TBI outcomes, threatening the validity of the research. In this review, the authors present evidence for the interference of anesthetics and analgesics in the natural course of brain injury in animal models of TBI. They suggest that drugs should be selected for or excluded from experimental TBI protocols on the basis of IACUC-approved experimental objectives in order to protect animal welfare and preserve the validity of TBI models.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsAnestheticsAnimalsBrain InjuriesHumansPainAnalgesicsAnesthetics

Identifiers

PMID23877609
PMCPMC3876742
OpenAlexW2065547297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.