ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013
Making vaccines "on demand": a potential solution for emerging pathogens and biodefense?
Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Current status of recombinant duck enteritis virus vector vaccine research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Review
- Review
- Vaccine Innovation Meta-Model for Pandemic Contexts.Journal of pharmaceutical innovation · 2023Article
- Information technology in emergency management of COVID-19 outbreak.Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2020Review
- Innovation, urgency and acceptance at the 9th Vaccine Renaissance.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2016Article
- Vaccine Development Against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.Current tropical medicine reports · 2016Review
- Middle East respiratory syndrome: obstacles and prospects for vaccine development.Expert review of vaccines · 2015Review
- Time for T? Immunoinformatics addresses vaccine design for neglected tropical and emerging infectious diseases.Expert review of vaccines · 2015Review
- Purified coronavirus spike protein nanoparticles induce coronavirus neutralizing antibodies in mice.Vaccine · 2014Article
- ICoVax 2013: the 3rd ISV Pre-conference Computational Vaccinology Workshop.BMC bioinformatics · 2014Article
- Report from the field: Overview of the Sixth Annual Vaccine Renaissance Conference.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The integrated US Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE) has made great strides in strategic preparedness and response capabilities. There have been numerous advances in planning, biothreat countermeasure development, licensure, manufacturing, stockpiling and deployment. Increased biodefense surveillance capability has dramatically improved, while new tools and increased awareness have fostered rapid identification of new potential public health pathogens. Unfortunately, structural delays in vaccine design, development, manufacture, clinical testing and licensure processes remain significant obstacles to an effective national biodefense rapid response capability. This is particularly true for the very real threat of "novel pathogens" such as the avian-origin influenzas H7N9 and H5N1, and new coronaviruses such as hCoV-EMC. Conventional approaches to vaccine development, production, clinical testing and licensure are incompatible with the prompt deployment needed for an effective public health response. An alternative approach, proposed here, is to apply computational vaccine design tools and rapid production technologies that now make it possible to engineer vaccines for novel emerging pathogen and WMD biowarfare agent countermeasures in record time. These new tools have the potential to significantly reduce the time needed to design string-of-epitope vaccines for previously unknown pathogens. The design process-from genome to gene sequence, ready to insert in a DNA plasmid-can now be accomplished in less than 24 h. While these vaccines are by no means "standard," the need for innovation in the vaccine design and production process is great. Should such vaccines be developed, their 60-d start-to-finish timeline would represent a 2-fold faster response than the current standard.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.