Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23877094›Full record

ReviewHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2013

Making vaccines "on demand": a potential solution for emerging pathogens and biodefense?

Anne S De Groot, Leo Einck, Leonard Moise, Michael Chambers, John Ballantyne, Robert W Malone, Matthew Ardito, William Martin

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Vaccine Innovation Meta-Model for Pandemic Contexts.Journal of pharmaceutical innovation · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Vaccine Development Against Middle East Respiratory Syndrome.Current tropical medicine reports · 2016
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Anne S De GrootEpiVax, Inc.; Providence, RI USA; Institute for Immunology and Informatics; University of Rhode Island; Providence, RI USA.
Leo Einck
Leonard Moise
Michael Chambers
John Ballantyne
Robert W Malone
Matthew Ardito
William Martin
Providence College · USAldevron (United States) · USEpiVax (United States) · USInstitute for Medical Informatics and Biostatistics · CHWest Coast Solutions (United States) · US

Funding

TRIAD Scientific Core: TRIAD ToolkitU19AI082642 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND · PI MARTIN, WILLIAM D · 2009 to 2013
$13.0M
NIAID NIH HHS AI082642NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integrated US Public Health Emergency Medical Countermeasures Enterprise (PHEMCE) has made great strides in strategic preparedness and response capabilities. There have been numerous advances in planning, biothreat countermeasure development, licensure, manufacturing, stockpiling and deployment. Increased biodefense surveillance capability has dramatically improved, while new tools and increased awareness have fostered rapid identification of new potential public health pathogens. Unfortunately, structural delays in vaccine design, development, manufacture, clinical testing and licensure processes remain significant obstacles to an effective national biodefense rapid response capability. This is particularly true for the very real threat of "novel pathogens" such as the avian-origin influenzas H7N9 and H5N1, and new coronaviruses such as hCoV-EMC. Conventional approaches to vaccine development, production, clinical testing and licensure are incompatible with the prompt deployment needed for an effective public health response. An alternative approach, proposed here, is to apply computational vaccine design tools and rapid production technologies that now make it possible to engineer vaccines for novel emerging pathogen and WMD biowarfare agent countermeasures in record time. These new tools have the potential to significantly reduce the time needed to design string-of-epitope vaccines for previously unknown pathogens. The design process-from genome to gene sequence, ready to insert in a DNA plasmid-can now be accomplished in less than 24 h. While these vaccines are by no means "standard," the need for innovation in the vaccine design and production process is great. Should such vaccines be developed, their 60-d start-to-finish timeline would represent a 2-fold faster response than the current standard.

Indexed as

Biological Warfare AgentsCivil DefenseCommunicable Diseases, EmergingHumansTechnology, PharmaceuticalTime FactorsVaccinesBiological Warfare AgentsVaccinesbiothreatcoronavirusemerging infectious diseaseH5N1H7N9immunoinformaticsmedical countermeasureSARSvaccine

Identifiers

PMID23877094
PMCPMC3906351
OpenAlexW1986356063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.