Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23876611›Full record

ReviewPhysics of life reviews2013

How life changes itself: the Read-Write (RW) genome.

James A Shapiro

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Physics of life reviews, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
16.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Vitalism and cognition in a conscious universe.Communicative & integrative biology · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. A systematic approach to cancer: evolution beyond selection.Clinical and translational medicine · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Stochasticity and determinism in cancer creation and progression.Convergent science physical oncology · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Physiology of the read-write genome.The Journal of physiology · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James A ShapiroDept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Chicago, GCIS W123B, 979 E. 57th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USA. Electronic address: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/james-a-shapiro.
University of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome has traditionally been treated as a Read-Only Memory (ROM) subject to change by copying errors and accidents. In this review, I propose that we need to change that perspective and understand the genome as an intricately formatted Read-Write (RW) data storage system constantly subject to cellular modifications and inscriptions. Cells operate under changing conditions and are continually modifying themselves by genome inscriptions. These inscriptions occur over three distinct time-scales (cell reproduction, multicellular development and evolutionary change) and involve a variety of different processes at each time scale (forming nucleoprotein complexes, epigenetic formatting and changes in DNA sequence structure). Research dating back to the 1930s has shown that genetic change is the result of cell-mediated processes, not simply accidents or damage to the DNA. This cell-active view of genome change applies to all scales of DNA sequence variation, from point mutations to large-scale genome rearrangements and whole genome duplications (WGDs). This conceptual change to active cell inscriptions controlling RW genome functions has profound implications for all areas of the life sciences.

Indexed as

Information Storage and RetrievalAnimalsBase SequenceCellsDNA DamageDNA ReplicationGenetic VariationGenomeGenomic InstabilityHumansTime FactorsAadenineargininebase excision repairBERCCDScis-regulatory moduleclass switch recombinationclustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeatsCNEcoding sequenceconserved nucleotide elementCRISPRCRMCSRcytosinedouble-strandDSEpigeneticsGGenome inscriptionsguanineIinosineKlong terminal repeatLTRlysineMBmega-base-pairsMGEmobile genetic elementMobile genetic elements (MGEs)natural genetic engineeringNatural genetic engineering (NGE)ncNERNGENHEJnon-codingnon-homologous end joiningnucleotide excision repairRRecrecombinationRITSRNA interference by transcriptional silencingTtarget-primed reverse transcriptionterminal inverted repeatTFthymineTIRTPRTtranscription factorUuracilWGDwhole genome duplication

Identifiers

PMID23876611
OpenAlexW2168060493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.