Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23876518›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2013

Comparison of 2 assays for diagnosing rotavirus and evaluating vaccine effectiveness in children with gastroenteritis.

Jacqueline E Tate, Slavica Mijatovic-Rustempasic, Ka Ian Tam, Freda C Lyde, Daniel C Payne, Peter Szilagyi, Kathryn Edwards, Mary Allen Staat, Geoffrey A Weinberg, Caroline B Hall and 5 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Comparison of three multiplex gastrointestinal platforms for the detection of gastroenteritis viruses.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2017
    Article
  16. Evaluation of the Field Performance of ImmunoCard STAT!The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Use of Patients With Diarrhea Who Test Negative for Rotavirus as Controls to Estimate Rotavirus Vaccine Effectiveness Through Case-Control Studies.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jacqueline E TateCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA. jqt8@cdc.gov
Slavica Mijatovic-Rustempasic
Ka Ian Tam
Freda C Lyde
Daniel C Payne
Peter Szilagyi
Kathryn Edwards
Mary Allen Staat
Geoffrey A Weinberg
Caroline B Hall
James Chappell
Monica McNeal
Jon R Gentsch
Michael D Bowen
Umesh D Parashar
University of Rochester · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We compared rotavirus detection rates in children with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) and in healthy controls using enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) and semiquantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). We calculated rotavirus vaccine effectiveness using different laboratory-based case definitions to determine which best identified the proportion of disease that was vaccine preventable. Of 648 AGE patients, 158 (24%) were EIA positive, and 157 were also qRT-PCR positive. An additional 65 (10%) were qRT-PCR positive but EIA negative. Of 500 healthy controls, 1 was EIA positive and 24 (5%) were qRT-PCR positive. Rotavirus vaccine was highly effective (84% [95% CI 71%-91%]) in EIA-positive children but offered no significant protection (14% [95% CI -105% to 64%]) in EIA-negative children for whom virus was detected by qRT-PCR alone. Children with rotavirus detected by qRT-PCR but not by EIA were not protected by vaccination, suggesting that rotavirus detected by qRT-PCR alone might not be causally associated with AGE in all patients.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseCase-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGastroenteritisHumansInfantMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRotavirusRotavirus InfectionsRotavirus VaccinesVaccinationVaccine PotencyRotavirus Vaccinesacute gastroenteritischildrendiagnosisenzyme immunoassayrotavirusRT-PCRviruses

Identifiers

PMID23876518
PMCPMC3739503
OpenAlexW2066543671

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.