Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23876490›Full record

SynthesisCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2013

Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative tests for lymph node status in endometrial cancer: a systematic review.

H M P Pelikan, J W Trum, F C H Bakers, R G H Beets-Tan, L J M Smits, R F P M Kruitwagen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FDG PET/CT in cancer: comparison of actual use with literature-based recommendations.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2016
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

H M P PelikanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bronovo Hospital, Bronovolaan 5, 2597 AX Den Haag, The Netherlands. h.pelikan@live.nl
J W Trum
F C H Bakers
R G H Beets-Tan
L J M Smits
R F P M Kruitwagen
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLBronovo Hospital · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundApproximately 72% of endometrial cancers are FIGO stage I at diagnosis and about 10% have lymph node metastases. An ideal diagnostic test for nodal disease would be able to prevent both overtreatment (i.e. unnecessary lymphadenectomy) and undertreatment (i.e. withholding lymphadenectomy or adjuvant postoperative treatment to patients with lymph node metastases).

objectivesIn this review we compare the accuracy of preoperative tests (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography-computed tomography, CA-125 serum levels, and ultrasonography) for the detection of lymph node metastases in endometrial cancers with the final histopathologic diagnosis after complete pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy as the gold standard.

methodA systematic search in MEDLINE (using PubMed), Embase and The Cochrane Library was performed up to 23 July 2012.

resultsWe found one article that met our inclusion criteria for computed tomography, none for magnetic resonance imaging, 2 for positron emission tomography/computed tomography), 2 for CA-125 and none for ultrasonography.

conclusionsDue to the lack of high-quality articles on a preoperative test for lymph node status in endometrial cancer, no proper comparison between these modalities can be made.

Indexed as

CA-125 AntigenEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, X-Ray ComputedCA-125 Antigen

Identifiers

PMID23876490
PMCPMC3719052
OpenAlexW2049916704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.