Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23875989›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP

Maximizing retention with high risk participants in a clinical trial.

Romina Kim, Norval Hickman, Kathleen Gali, Nicholas Orozco, Judith J Prochaska

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of health promotion : AJHP. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Treating Tobacco Dependence at the Intersection of Diversity, Poverty, and Mental Illness: A Randomized Feasibility and Replication Trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2015
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. New Home, New You: A retrospective mixed-methods evaluation of a health-related behavioural intervention programme supporting social housing tenants.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Romina Kim
Norval Hickman
Kathleen Gali
Nicholas Orozco
Judith J Prochaska
Michigan State University · USSan Francisco State University · USStanford University · USUniversity of California Office of the PresidentUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

TREATMENTS FOR COMPLEX PATIENTS IN NEW SETTINGSP50DA009253 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUYDISH, JOSEPH R · 1994 to 2014
$28.2M
Substance Use Disorders Treatment/Services Research Training ProgramT32DA007250 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Derek D Satre, Janice Y Tsoh · 1991 to 2026
$7.4M
Postdoctoral training in tobacco controlR25CA113710 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GLANTZ, STANTON ARNOLD · 2006 to 2015
$5.4M
Treating Tobacco Dependence in Inpatient PsychiatryK23DA018691 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI PROCHASKA, JUDITH J. · 2005 to 2009
$769k
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA113710NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA018691NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA009253NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA09253NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007250NIDA NIH HHS T32DA007250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe effective retention strategies in a clinical trial with a high risk, low-income, and vulnerable patient population with serious mental illness.

designFollow-up assessments were conducted for a randomized clinical tobacco treatment trial at 3, 6, and 12 months postbaseline. Initial follow-up rates of <40% at 3 months led to implementation of proactive retention strategies including obtaining extensive contact information; building relationships with case managers and social workers; contacting jails and prisons; text messaging, e-mailing, and messaging via social networking sites; identifying appointments via electronic medical record; and field outreach to treatment facilities, residences, and parks.

settingLarge urban public hospital. SUBJECTS: Participants were current smokers recruited from 100% smoke-free locked psychiatry units. MEASURES: Assessments covered demographics, substance use, and mental health functioning. ANALYSIS: Retention rates were plotted over time in relation to key retention strategies. Chi-square and t-tests were used to examine participant predictors of retention at each follow-up. At the 12-month follow-up, the retention strategies that most frequently led to assessment completion were identified.

resultsThe sample (N = 100) was 65% male; age x = 39.5 years (SD = 11.3); 44% non-Hispanic white; 46% on Medicaid and 34% uninsured; 79% unemployed; and 48% unstably housed. Proactive retention strategies dramatically increased follow-up rates, concluding at 3 months = 82.65%, 6 months = 89.69%, and 12 months = 92.78%. Married and divorced/separated/widowed participants, those with higher income, and participants with alcohol or illicit drug problems had increased retention from 3- to 12-month follow-up.

conclusionFollow-up rates improved as proactive methods to contact participants were implemented. Dedicated research staff, multiple methods, community networking, and outreach within drug treatment settings improved retention.

Indexed as

Mental DisordersPatient DropoutsPovertyAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHospitals, GeneralHospitals, PublicHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSan FranciscoSmoking CessationTobacco Use Disorder

Identifiers

PMID23875989
PMCPMC5110435
OpenAlexW2062641573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.