Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23875800›Full record

ReviewAnnual review of genomics and human genetics2013

Growing up in the genomic era: implications of whole-genome sequencing for children, families, and pediatric practice.

Christopher H Wade, Beth A Tarini, Benjamin S Wilfond

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Genetics of liver disease in adults.Hepatology communications · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Genomic tools for health: Secondary findings as findings to be shared.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Genome Diagnostics: Novel Strategies for Measuring Value.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher H WadeNursing and Health Studies Program, University of Washington Bothell, Bothell, Washington 98011; email: cwade@uwb.edu.
Beth A Tarini
Benjamin S Wilfond

Funding

Improving Healthcare Delivery for Infants with Positive Newborn Screening ResultsK23HD057994 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI TARINI, BETH A · 2009 to 2013
$662k
NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD057994NICHD NIH HHS K23HD057994
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) has advanced to a point where it is beginning to be integrated into pediatric practice. With little consensus on how to maximize the benefits of WGS for children, there is a growing need for focused efforts that connect researchers, clinicians, and families to chart a path forward. To illustrate relevant concerns, two contrasting applications of pediatric WGS are explored: clinical use with children who have undiagnosed conditions, and population-based screening. Specific challenges for health care services, policy development, and the well-being of children are discussed in light of current research. In the interest of ensuring evidence-based pediatric WGS, strategies are identified for advancing our understanding of what it means for children to grow up with WGS results guiding their health care.

Indexed as

PediatricsChildGenome, HumanGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID23875800
PMCPMC4159555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.