Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874896›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Roles for ordered and bulk solvent in ligand recognition and docking in two related cavities.

Sarah Barelier, Sarah E Boyce, Inbar Fish, Marcus Fischer, David B Goodin, Brian K Shoichet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Water Networks Repopulate Protein-Ligand Interfaces with Temperature.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Testing inhomogeneous solvation theory in structure-based ligand discovery.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  5. Docking Screens for Novel Ligands Conferring New Biology.Journal of medicinal chemistry · 2016
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sarah BarelierDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Sarah E Boyce
Inbar Fish
Marcus Fischer
David B Goodin
Brian K Shoichet

Funding

DESIGN AND EXPERIMENTAL TESTING OF NEW DOCKING METHODSR01GM059957 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI SHOICHET, BRIAN K · 1999 to 2017
$4.4M
NOVEL SUBSTRATE OXIDATION BY ENZYME ENGINEERINGR01GM041049 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GOODIN, DAVID B. · 1994 to 2014
$3.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM59957NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM041049NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM059957
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key challenge in structure-based discovery is accounting for modulation of protein-ligand interactions by ordered and bulk solvent. To investigate this, we compared ligand binding to a buried cavity in Cytochrome c Peroxidase (CcP), where affinity is dominated by a single ionic interaction, versus a cavity variant partly opened to solvent by loop deletion. This opening had unexpected effects on ligand orientation, affinity, and ordered water structure. Some ligands lost over ten-fold in affinity and reoriented in the cavity, while others retained their geometries, formed new interactions with water networks, and improved affinity. To test our ability to discover new ligands against this opened site prospectively, a 534,000 fragment library was docked against the open cavity using two models of ligand solvation. Using an older solvation model that prioritized many neutral molecules, three such uncharged docking hits were tested, none of which was observed to bind; these molecules were not highly ranked by the new, context-dependent solvation score. Using this new method, another 15 highly-ranked molecules were tested for binding. In contrast to the previous result, 14 of these bound detectably, with affinities ranging from 8 µM to 2 mM. In crystal structures, four of these new ligands superposed well with the docking predictions but two did not, reflecting unanticipated interactions with newly ordered waters molecules. Comparing recognition between this open cavity and its buried analog begins to isolate the roles of ordered solvent in a system that lends itself readily to prospective testing and that may be broadly useful to the community.

Indexed as

LigandsModels, MolecularProtein ConformationCrystallographyCytochrome-c PeroxidaseProtein BindingSolventsWaterCytochrome-c PeroxidaseLigandsSolventsWater

Identifiers

PMID23874896
PMCPMC3715451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.