Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874819›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2013

Postoperative chemoradiotherapy versus postoperative chemotherapy for completely resected gastric cancer with D2 Lymphadenectomy: a meta-analysis.

Yuan-Yuan Huang, Qiong Yang, Si-Wei Zhou, Ying Wei, Yan-Xian Chen, De-Rong Xie, Bei Zhang

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Postoperative Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy on the Survival of Stage III Gastric Cancer.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for resected gastric cancer: should we use selection criteria?Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Adjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer : Treatment results and analysis of possible prognostic factors.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2017
    Article
  13. Prognostic impact of nodal status and therapeutic implications.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2017
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yuan-Yuan HuangDepartment of VIP, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, PR China.
Qiong Yang
Si-Wei Zhou
Ying Wei
Yan-Xian Chen
De-Rong Xie
Bei Zhang
Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital · CNSun Yat-sen University Cancer Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBoth chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy are used in postoperative adjuvant therapy for resected gastric cancer. However, it is controversial whether chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy is the optimal strategy for patients with gastric cancer after D2 lymphadenectomy. The present meta-analysis aims to provide more evidence on the relative benefits of adjuvant therapies in this setting.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials, extracted time-to-event data using Tierney methods (when not reported), and performed meta-analysis to obtain the relative hazards of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy to chemotherapy on efficacy and toxicities.

resultsA total of 895 patients from 3 randomized controlled trials were identified for this meta-analysis. All patients were from Asian countries. Our results showed that postoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly improved locoregional recurrence-free survival [LRRFS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.32-0.87, p = 0.01] and disease-free survival (DFS: HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59-0.89, p = 0.002); however, the improvement of distant metastasis recurrence-free survival (DMRFS: HR = 0.86; 95% CI = 0.66-1.11, p = 0.25) and overall survival (OS: HR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.61-1.03, p = 0.08) were non-significant. The main grade 3 or 4 toxicities were equivalent between the two groups.

conclusionIn non-selected Asian patients with resected gastric cancer who underwent D2 lymphadenectomy, postoperative chemoradiotherapy improved LRRFS and DFS but might not improve OS compared to postoperative chemotherapy.

Indexed as

AsiaChemoradiotherapy, AdjuvantChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalGastrectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionOdds RatioPostoperative PeriodProportional Hazards ModelsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSensitivity and SpecificityStomach Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID23874819
PMCPMC3715514
OpenAlexW1997924987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.