Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874704›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Prospecting environmental mycobacteria: combined molecular approaches reveal unprecedented diversity.

Alessandra Pontiroli, Tanya T Khera, Brian B Oakley, Sam Mason, Scot E Dowd, Emma R Travis, Girum Erenso, Abraham Aseffa, Orin Courtenay, Elizabeth M H Wellington

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Heat-killedFood science & nutrition · 2021
    Article
  6. DoesVeterinary medicine international · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A Global Survey of Mycobacterial Diversity in Soil.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The many lives of nontuberculous mycobacteria.Journal of bacteriology · 2018
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alessandra PontiroliSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom. alessandra.pontiroli@gmail.com
Tanya T Khera
Brian B Oakley
Sam Mason
Scot E Dowd
Emma R Travis
Girum Erenso
Abraham Aseffa
Orin Courtenay
Elizabeth M H Wellington
University of Warwick · GBArmauer Hansen Research Institute · ETAgricultural Research Service · USMassanutten Regional Library · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E020925/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBSRCBB/E020925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEnvironmental mycobacteria (EM) include species commonly found in various terrestrial and aquatic environments, encompassing animal and human pathogens in addition to saprophytes. Approximately 150 EM species can be separated into fast and slow growers based on sequence and copy number differences of their 16S rRNA genes. Cultivation methods are not appropriate for diversity studies; few studies have investigated EM diversity in soil despite their importance as potential reservoirs of pathogens and their hypothesized role in masking or blocking M. bovis BCG vaccine.

methodsWe report here the development, optimization and validation of molecular assays targeting the 16S rRNA gene to assess diversity and prevalence of fast and slow growing EM in representative soils from semi tropical and temperate areas. New primer sets were designed also to target uniquely slow growing mycobacteria and used with PCR-DGGE, tag-encoded Titanium amplicon pyrosequencing and quantitative PCR.

resultsPCR-DGGE and pyrosequencing provided a consensus of EM diversity; for example, a high abundance of pyrosequencing reads and DGGE bands corresponded to M. moriokaense, M. colombiense and M. riyadhense. As expected pyrosequencing provided more comprehensive information; additional prevalent species included M. chlorophenolicum, M. neglectum, M. gordonae, M. aemonae. Prevalence of the total Mycobacterium genus in the soil samples ranged from 2.3×10(7) to 2.7×10(8) gene targets g(-1); slow growers prevalence from 2.9×10(5) to 1.2×10(7) cells g(-1).

conclusionsThis combined molecular approach enabled an unprecedented qualitative and quantitative assessment of EM across soil samples. Good concordance was found between methods and the bioinformatics analysis was validated by random resampling. Sequences from most pathogenic groups associated with slow growth were identified in extenso in all soils tested with a specific assay, allowing to unmask them from the Mycobacterium whole genus, in which, as minority members, they would have remained undetected.

Indexed as

BiodiversityClimateSoil MicrobiologyBase SequenceComputational BiologyDenaturing Gradient Gel ElectrophoresisDNA PrimersEthiopiaMolecular Sequence DataMycobacteriumPhylogenyReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASpecies SpecificityDNA PrimersRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID23874704
PMCPMC3715504
OpenAlexW1992632417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.