Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874365›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2013

Association of Medical Directors of Information Systems consensus on inpatient electronic health record documentation.

J Shoolin, L Ozeran, C Hamann, W Bria

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Addressing Note Bloat: Solutions for Effective Clinical Documentation.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Neonatal informatics: past, present and future.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Summarizing Patients' Problems from Hospital Progress Notes Using Pre-trained Sequence-to-Sequence Models.Proceedings of COLING. International Conference on Computational Linguistics · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Hierarchical Annotation for Building A Suite of Clinical Natural Language Processing Tasks: Progress Note Understanding.LREC ... International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation : [proceedings]. International Conference on Language Resources & Evaluation · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Frequent but fragmented: use of note templates to document outpatient visits at an academic health center.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J ShoolinAdvocate Healthcare , Glencoe, Illinois, USA. joel.shoolin@gmail.com
L Ozeran
C Hamann
W Bria

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2013, electronic documentation of clinical care stands at a crossroads. The benefits of creating digital notes are at risk of being overwhelmed by the inclusion of easily importable detail. Providers are the primary authors of encounters with patients. We must document clearly our understanding of patients and our communication with them and our colleagues. We want to document efficiently to meet without exceeding documentation guidelines. We copy and paste documentation, because it not only simplifies the documentation process generally, but also supports meeting coding and regulatory requirements specifically. Since the primary goal of our profession is to spend as much time as possible listening to, understanding and helping patients, clinicians need information technology to make electronic documentation easier, not harder. At the same time, there should be reasonable restrictions on the use of copy and paste to limit the growing challenge of 'note bloat'. We must find the right balance between ease of use and thoughtless documentation. The guiding principles in this document may be used to launch an interdisciplinary dialogue that promotes useful and necessary documentation that best facilitates efficient information capture and effective display.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsInpatientsSocieties, MedicalDocumentationHumansAPSO noteClinical documentationcopy-pastedocumentation processinformation captureinpatient clinical notesnote bloatSOAP

Identifiers

PMID23874365
PMCPMC3716423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.