Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874300›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2013

A delicate balance: Iron metabolism and diseases of the brain.

Dominic Hare, Scott Ayton, Ashley Bush, Peng Lei

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02990559 (Neuroimaging of Donor Iron Deficient Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 221 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
221citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02990559 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Neuroimaging of Donor Iron Deficient Study (DIDS)

TypeobservationalSponsorColumbia UniversityRan2017 to 2021Enrolled75ConditionsIron Deficiency
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

221 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 430 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. MatchingFrontiers in neuroanatomy · 2019
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

161 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dominic HareThe Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne VIC, Australia ; Elemental Bio-imaging Facility, University of Technology Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Scott Ayton
Ashley Bush
Peng Lei
University of Melbourne · AUFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AUUniversity of Technology Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Iron is the most abundant transition metal within the brain, and is vital for a number of cellular processes including neurotransmitter synthesis, myelination of neurons, and mitochondrial function. Redox cycling between ferrous and ferric iron is utilized in biology for various electron transfer reactions essential to life, yet this same chemistry mediates deleterious reactions with oxygen that induce oxidative stress. Consequently, there is a precise and tightly controlled mechanism to regulate iron in the brain. When iron is dysregulated, both conditions of iron overload and iron deficiencies are harmful to the brain. This review focuses on how iron metabolism is maintained in the brain, and how an alteration to iron and iron metabolism adversely affects neurological function.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseiron chelationiron deficiencyiron regulationParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID23874300
PMCPMC3715022
OpenAlexW2114655563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.