Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874273›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2013

The Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) model: theoretical, empirical, and clinical advances.

Jerker Rönnberg, Thomas Lunner, Adriana Zekveld, Patrik Sörqvist, Henrik Danielsson, Björn Lyxell, Orjan Dahlström, Carine Signoret, Stefan Stenfelt, M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 453 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
453citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

453 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The effect of noise on listening effort in children as measured using different methods: a systematic review and meta-analyses.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Relationships Between Auditory Processing and Cognitive Abilities in Adults: A Systematic Review.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Efficacy of a structured auditory training module in older individuals with hearing loss: a randomized controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Longitudinal adaptations in neural and behavioral systems following hearing restoration using cochlear implants.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Integrated digit-in-noise testing for hearing and cognitive screening.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

393 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jerker RönnbergDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University Linköping, Sweden ; Linnaeus Centre HEAD, Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University Linköping, Sweden.
Thomas Lunner
Adriana Zekveld
Patrik Sörqvist
Henrik Danielsson
Björn Lyxell
Orjan Dahlström
Carine Signoret
Stefan Stenfelt
M Kathleen Pichora-Fuller
Mary Rudner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Working memory is important for online language processing during conversation. We use it to maintain relevant information, to inhibit or ignore irrelevant information, and to attend to conversation selectively. Working memory helps us to keep track of and actively participate in conversation, including taking turns and following the gist. This paper examines the Ease of Language Understanding model (i.e., the ELU model, Rönnberg, 2003; Rönnberg et al., 2008) in light of new behavioral and neural findings concerning the role of working memory capacity (WMC) in uni-modal and bimodal language processing. The new ELU model is a meaning prediction system that depends on phonological and semantic interactions in rapid implicit and slower explicit processing mechanisms that both depend on WMC albeit in different ways. It is based on findings that address the relationship between WMC and (a) early attention processes in listening to speech, (b) signal processing in hearing aids and its effects on short-term memory, (c) inhibition of speech maskers and its effect on episodic long-term memory, (d) the effects of hearing impairment on episodic and semantic long-term memory, and finally, (e) listening effort. New predictions and clinical implications are outlined. Comparisons with other WMC and speech perception models are made.

Indexed as

attentionbrain imaging analysishearing losslanguage understandinglong-term memoryoscillationsspeech in noiseworking memory capacity

Identifiers

PMID23874273
PMCPMC3710434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.