Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874195›Full record

ReviewPLoS pathogens2013

It's no fluke: the planarian as a model for understanding schistosomes.

James J Collins, Phillip A Newmark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PLoS pathogens, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Unexpected encounter of the parasitic kind.World journal of stem cells · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Utilizing the planarian voltage-gated ion channel transcriptome to resolve a role for a CaBiochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2017
    Article
  15. Schistosomiasis as a disease of stem cells.Current opinion in genetics & development · 2016
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James J CollinsHoward Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Neuroscience Program, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois, United States of America.
Phillip A Newmark

Funding

Stem cell proliferation and differentiation in planariaR01HD043403 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI Phillip A Newmark · 2003 to 2026
$5.1M
Developing comparative and functional genomic approaches to study SchistosomaR21AI099642 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI NEWMARK, PHILLIP A · 2012 to 2013
$424k
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIAID NIH HHS R21 AI099642NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD043403
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Life Cycle StagesModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansPlanariansSchistosomaSchistosomiasisSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID23874195
PMCPMC3715406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.