Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874188›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Dynamics of SIN asymmetry establishment.

Archana Bajpai, Anna Feoktistova, Jun-Song Chen, Dannel McCollum, Masamitsu Sato, Rafael E Carazo-Salas, Kathleen L Gould, Attila Csikász-Nagy

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Maximal aggregation of polynomial dynamical systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  3. Efficient Switches in Biology and Computer Science.PLoS computational biology · 2017
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Archana BajpaiMicrosoft Research-University of Trento Centre for Computational Systems Biology, Piazza Manifattura 1, Rovereto, Italy.
Anna Feoktistova
Jun-Song Chen
Dannel McCollum
Masamitsu Sato
Rafael E Carazo-Salas
Kathleen L Gould
Attila Csikász-Nagy
University of Trento · ITVanderbilt University · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USWaseda University · JPWellcome/Cancer Research UK Gurdon Institute · GB

Funding

Regulation of Hippo pathway signaling by mechanical forcesR01GM058406 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MCCOLLUM, DANNEL · 1998 to 2023
$8.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM058406Wellcome Trust 092096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Timing of cell division is coordinated by the Septation Initiation Network (SIN) in fission yeast. SIN activation is initiated at the two spindle pole bodies (SPB) of the cell in metaphase, but only one of these SPBs contains an active SIN in anaphase, while SIN is inactivated in the other by the Cdc16-Byr4 GAP complex. Most of the factors that are needed for such asymmetry establishment have been already characterized, but we lack the molecular details that drive such quick asymmetric distribution of molecules at the two SPBs. Here we investigate the problem by computational modeling and, after establishing a minimal system with two antagonists that can drive reliable asymmetry establishment, we incorporate the current knowledge on the basic SIN regulators into an extended model with molecular details of the key regulators. The model can capture several peculiar earlier experimental findings and also predicts the behavior of double and triple SIN mutants. We experimentally tested one prediction, that phosphorylation of the scaffold protein Cdc11 by a SIN kinase and the core cell cycle regulatory Cyclin dependent kinase (Cdk) can compensate for mutations in the SIN inhibitor Cdc16 with different efficiencies. One aspect of the prediction failed, highlighting a potential hole in our current knowledge. Further experimental tests revealed that SIN induced Cdc11 phosphorylation might have two separate effects. We conclude that SIN asymmetry is established by the antagonistic interactions between SIN and its inhibitor Cdc16-Byr4, partially through the regulation of Cdc11 phosphorylation states.

Indexed as

Cell CycleCell Cycle ProteinsPhosphorylationSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsSpindle ApparatusCDC11 protein, S pombeCell Cycle ProteinsSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins

Identifiers

PMID23874188
PMCPMC3708865
OpenAlexW2064044886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.