Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874181›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Successful reconstruction of a physiological circuit with known connectivity from spiking activity alone.

Felipe Gerhard, Tilman Kispersky, Gabrielle J Gutierrez, Eve Marder, Mark Kramer, Uri Eden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Individualized temporal patterns drive human sleep spindle timing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bringing Anatomical Information into Neuronal Network Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  10. Frequency-Division Multiplexing with Graphene Active Electrodes for Neurosensor Applications.IEEE transactions on circuits and systems. II, Express briefs : a publication of the IEEE Circuits and Systems Society · 2021
    Article
  11. Monosynaptic inference via finely-timed spikes.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Modeling the Short-Term Dynamics ofThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Felipe GerhardBrain Mind Institute, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland. felipe.gerhard@epfl.ch
Tilman Kispersky
Gabrielle J Gutierrez
Eve Marder
Mark Kramer
Uri Eden

Funding

Variability and Compensation in Reliable Neuronal NetworksR01MH046742 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1990 to 2025
$7.8M
The Unfolded Protein Response in Ischemic StrokeR01NS099590 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Wei Yang · 2016 to 2026
$3.7M
Multiscale analysis and modeling of spatiotemporal dynamics in human epilepsyR01NS072023 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI EDEN, URI TZVI, KRAMER, MARK ALAN · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
CRCNS: Hitting the spot: Optimizing Placement of Deep Brain Stimulation ElectrodeR01NS073118 · NINDS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI CHENG, MING L, EDEN, URI TZVI · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
INTRINSIC PLASTICITY IN OSCILLATORY NEURAL NETWORKSR37MH046742 · NIMH · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI MARDER, EVE E · 1995 to 2004
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS MH 46742NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH046742NIMH NIH HHS R37 MH046742NINDS NIH HHS F32 NS099590NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS072023NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS073118NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS099590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying the structure and dynamics of synaptic interactions between neurons is the first step to understanding neural network dynamics. The presence of synaptic connections is traditionally inferred through the use of targeted stimulation and paired recordings or by post-hoc histology. More recently, causal network inference algorithms have been proposed to deduce connectivity directly from electrophysiological signals, such as extracellularly recorded spiking activity. Usually, these algorithms have not been validated on a neurophysiological data set for which the actual circuitry is known. Recent work has shown that traditional network inference algorithms based on linear models typically fail to identify the correct coupling of a small central pattern generating circuit in the stomatogastric ganglion of the crab Cancer borealis. In this work, we show that point process models of observed spike trains can guide inference of relative connectivity estimates that match the known physiological connectivity of the central pattern generator up to a choice of threshold. We elucidate the necessary steps to derive faithful connectivity estimates from a model that incorporates the spike train nature of the data. We then apply the model to measure changes in the effective connectivity pattern in response to two pharmacological interventions, which affect both intrinsic neural dynamics and synaptic transmission. Our results provide the first successful application of a network inference algorithm to a circuit for which the actual physiological synapses between neurons are known. The point process methodology presented here generalizes well to larger networks and can describe the statistics of neural populations. In general we show that advanced statistical models allow for the characterization of effective network structure, deciphering underlying network dynamics and estimating information-processing capabilities.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, BiologicalBiophysicsNeurons

Identifiers

PMID23874181
PMCPMC3708849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.