ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Successful reconstruction of a physiological circuit with known connectivity from spiking activity alone.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inferring effective neuronal circuits via network flux counting.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Sensory and palatability coding of taste stimuli in cortex involves dynamic and asymmetric cortico-amygdalar interactions.Journal of neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Spontaneous Dynamics Predict the Effects of Targeted Intervention in Hippocampal Neuronal Cultures.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Individualized temporal patterns drive human sleep spindle timing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Identifying Effective Connectivity between Stochastic Neurons with Variable-Length Memory Using a Transfer Entropy Rate Estimator.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Ensemble learning and ground-truth validation of synaptic connectivity inferred from spike trains.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Granger causality analysis for calcium transients in neuronal networks, challenges and improvements.eLife · 2023Article
- Small, correlated changes in synaptic connectivity may facilitate rapid motor learning.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Bringing Anatomical Information into Neuronal Network Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Article
- Frequency-Division Multiplexing with Graphene Active Electrodes for Neurosensor Applications.IEEE transactions on circuits and systems. II, Express briefs : a publication of the IEEE Circuits and Systems Society · 2021Article
- Monosynaptic inference via finely-timed spikes.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2021Article
- Estimating Transfer Entropy in Continuous Time Between Neural Spike Trains or Other Event-Based Data.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Efficient spline regression for neural spiking data.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- Modeling the Short-Term Dynamics ofThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Recurrent circuit dynamics underlie persistent activity in the macaque frontoparietal network.eLife · 2020Article
- Inference of synaptic connectivity and external variability in neural microcircuits.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
- Article
- A Neural Population Mechanism for Rapid Learning.Neuron · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying the structure and dynamics of synaptic interactions between neurons is the first step to understanding neural network dynamics. The presence of synaptic connections is traditionally inferred through the use of targeted stimulation and paired recordings or by post-hoc histology. More recently, causal network inference algorithms have been proposed to deduce connectivity directly from electrophysiological signals, such as extracellularly recorded spiking activity. Usually, these algorithms have not been validated on a neurophysiological data set for which the actual circuitry is known. Recent work has shown that traditional network inference algorithms based on linear models typically fail to identify the correct coupling of a small central pattern generating circuit in the stomatogastric ganglion of the crab Cancer borealis. In this work, we show that point process models of observed spike trains can guide inference of relative connectivity estimates that match the known physiological connectivity of the central pattern generator up to a choice of threshold. We elucidate the necessary steps to derive faithful connectivity estimates from a model that incorporates the spike train nature of the data. We then apply the model to measure changes in the effective connectivity pattern in response to two pharmacological interventions, which affect both intrinsic neural dynamics and synaptic transmission. Our results provide the first successful application of a network inference algorithm to a circuit for which the actual physiological synapses between neurons are known. The point process methodology presented here generalizes well to larger networks and can describe the statistics of neural populations. In general we show that advanced statistical models allow for the characterization of effective network structure, deciphering underlying network dynamics and estimating information-processing capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.