ArticlePLoS computational biology2013
Gain control network conditions in early sensory coding.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gain modulation and odor concentration invariance in early olfactory networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- The functional logic of odor information processing in the Drosophila antennal lobe.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Non-synaptic interactions between olfactory receptor neurons, a possible key feature of odor processing in flies.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- A Spike Time-Dependent Online Learning Algorithm Derived From Biological Olfaction.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Circuit variability interacts with excitatory-inhibitory diversity of interneurons to regulate network encoding capacity.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Event- and Time-Driven Techniques Using Parallel CPU-GPU Co-processing for Spiking Neural Networks.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2017Article
- A Framework for Quantitative Modeling of Neural Circuits Involved in Sleep-to-Wake Transition.Frontiers in neurology · 2015Review
- Computational models to understand decision making and pattern recognition in the insect brain.Current opinion in insect science · 2014Article
- Simultaneous long-term recordings at two neuronal processing stages in behaving honeybees.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014Article
- Subtractive, divisive and non-monotonic gain control in feedforward nets linearized by noise and delays.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
- Data-driven inference of network connectivity for modeling the dynamics of neural codes in the insect antennal lobe.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gain control is essential for the proper function of any sensory system. However, the precise mechanisms for achieving effective gain control in the brain are unknown. Based on our understanding of the existence and strength of connections in the insect olfactory system, we analyze the conditions that lead to controlled gain in a randomly connected network of excitatory and inhibitory neurons. We consider two scenarios for the variation of input into the system. In the first case, the intensity of the sensory input controls the input currents to a fixed proportion of neurons of the excitatory and inhibitory populations. In the second case, increasing intensity of the sensory stimulus will both, recruit an increasing number of neurons that receive input and change the input current that they receive. Using a mean field approximation for the network activity we derive relationships between the parameters of the network that ensure that the overall level of activity of the excitatory population remains unchanged for increasing intensity of the external stimulation. We find that, first, the main parameters that regulate network gain are the probabilities of connections from the inhibitory population to the excitatory population and of the connections within the inhibitory population. Second, we show that strict gain control is not achievable in a random network in the second case, when the input recruits an increasing number of neurons. Finally, we confirm that the gain control conditions derived from the mean field approximation are valid in simulations of firing rate models and Hodgkin-Huxley conductance based models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.