Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874174›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2013

Hierarchical modeling for rare event detection and cell subset alignment across flow cytometry samples.

Andrew Cron, Cécile Gouttefangeas, Jacob Frelinger, Lin Lin, Satwinder K Singh, Cedrik M Britten, Marij J P Welters, Sjoerd H van der Burg, Mike West, Cliburn Chan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Modeling of cytometry data in logarithmic space: When is a bimodal distribution not bimodal?Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Toward deterministic and semiautomated SPADE analysis.Cytometry. Part A : the journal of the International Society for Analytical Cytology · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew CronDepartment of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Cécile Gouttefangeas
Jacob Frelinger
Lin Lin
Satwinder K Singh
Cedrik M Britten
Marij J P Welters
Sjoerd H van der Burg
Mike West
Cliburn Chan
Duke University · USLeiden University Medical Center · NLDuke University Hospital · USFred Hutch Cancer Center · USJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Tübingen · DE

Funding

Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Project 6P50GM081883 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BENFEY, PHILIP N · 2007 to 2012
$14.9M
Immune profiling of multi-parameter flow cytometry using computational statisticsRC1AI086032 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CHAN, CLIBURN C · 2009 to 2010
$977k
NIAID NIH HHS 5P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS RC1 AI086032NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM081883NIGMS NIH HHS P50-GM081883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flow cytometry is the prototypical assay for multi-parameter single cell analysis, and is essential in vaccine and biomarker research for the enumeration of antigen-specific lymphocytes that are often found in extremely low frequencies (0.1% or less). Standard analysis of flow cytometry data relies on visual identification of cell subsets by experts, a process that is subjective and often difficult to reproduce. An alternative and more objective approach is the use of statistical models to identify cell subsets of interest in an automated fashion. Two specific challenges for automated analysis are to detect extremely low frequency event subsets without biasing the estimate by pre-processing enrichment, and the ability to align cell subsets across multiple data samples for comparative analysis. In this manuscript, we develop hierarchical modeling extensions to the Dirichlet Process Gaussian Mixture Model (DPGMM) approach we have previously described for cell subset identification, and show that the hierarchical DPGMM (HDPGMM) naturally generates an aligned data model that captures both commonalities and variations across multiple samples. HDPGMM also increases the sensitivity to extremely low frequency events by sharing information across multiple samples analyzed simultaneously. We validate the accuracy and reproducibility of HDPGMM estimates of antigen-specific T cells on clinically relevant reference peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) samples with known frequencies of antigen-specific T cells. These cell samples take advantage of retrovirally TCR-transduced T cells spiked into autologous PBMC samples to give a defined number of antigen-specific T cells detectable by HLA-peptide multimer binding. We provide open source software that can take advantage of both multiple processors and GPU-acceleration to perform the numerically-demanding computations. We show that hierarchical modeling is a useful probabilistic approach that can provide a consistent labeling of cell subsets and increase the sensitivity of rare event detection in the context of quantifying antigen-specific immune responses.

Indexed as

Lymphocyte SubsetsModels, BiologicalFlow CytometryHumansReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID23874174
PMCPMC3708855
OpenAlexW2083404883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.