Evidence map›Paper›PMID 23874096›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2013

Computational study on the interactions and orientation of monoclonal human immunoglobulin G on a polystyrene surface.

Namsrai Javkhlantugs, Hexig Bayar, Chimed Ganzorig, Kazuyoshi Ueda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Namsrai JavkhlantugsCenter for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology and Department of Chemical Technology, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, National University of Mongolia, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia. javkhlantugs@num.edu.mn
Hexig Bayar
Chimed Ganzorig
Kazuyoshi Ueda

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Having a theoretical understanding of the orientation of immunoglobulin on an immobilized solid surface is important in biomedical pathogen-detecting systems and cellular analysis. Despite the stable adsorption of immunoglobulin on a polystyrene (PS) surface that has been applied in many kinds of immunoassays, there are many uncertainties in antibody-based clinical and biological experimental methods. To understand the binding mechanism and physicochemical interactions between immunoglobulin and the PS surface at the atomic level, we investigated the binding behavior and interactions of the monoclonal immunoglobulin G (IgG) on the PS surface using the computational method. In our docking simulation with the different arrangement of translational and rotational orientation of IgG onto the PS surface, three typical orientation patterns of the immunoglobulin G on the PS surface were found. We precisely analyzed these orientation patterns and clarified how the immunoglobulin G interacts with the PS surface at atomic scale in the beginning of the adsorption process. Major driving forces for the adsorption of IgG onto the PS surface come from serine (Ser), aspartic acid (Asp), and glutamic acid (Glu) residues.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalImmunoglobulin GMolecular Docking SimulationAdsorptionAmino AcidsHumansImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsMolecular Dynamics SimulationNanotechnologyPolystyrenesProtein BindingAmino AcidsAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsImmunoglobulin Fc FragmentsImmunoglobulin GPolystyrenesbionano interfaceIgGimmunoassayphysical adsorptionpolystyrenesimulation

Identifiers

PMID23874096
PMCPMC3713897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.